Purdom v. United States, 355 U.S. 913 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Purdom v. United States, 355 U.S. 913 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Driver (sdd, 1991-02-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Driver
D.S.D. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Daigle, 149 F.Supp. 409 (D.D.C.1957), aff'd, 248 F.2d 608 (D.C.Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 913 , 78 S.Ct. 344 , 2 L.Ed.2d 274 (1958).
cited Cited "see" State v. Logan
Utah · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Daigle, 149 F.Supp. 409 (D.C.Cir.1957), aff'd per curiam, 248 F.2d 608 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 913 , 78 S.Ct. 344 , 2 L.Ed.2d 274 (1958); 4 C.
cited Cited "see" Larry Charles Clonce v. United States
10th Cir. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Purdom v. United States, 10 Cir., 249 F.2d 822, 827 , certiorari denied 355 U.S. 913 , 78 S.Ct. 341 , 2 L.Ed.2d 273 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Cassandra Y. Wilson
9th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Powell, the Supreme Court stated that "[n]othing in this opinion is intended to decide the proper resolution of a situation where a defendant is convicted of two crimes, where a guilty verdict on one count logically excludes a finding of guilt on the other." Id. at 69 n. 8; see also United States v. Daigle, 149 F.Supp. 409, 414 (D.D.C.) (where a "guilty verdict on one count [in the indictment] negatives some fact essential to a finding of guilty on a second count, two guilty verdicts may not stand"), aff'd per curiam, 248 F.2d 608 (D.C.Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 913 (1958). 131 Wilso…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States Ex Rel. Flowers v. Illinois Department of Corrections
N.D. Ill. · 1991 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Daigle, 149 F.Supp. 409, 413-15 (D.D.C.), aff’d, 248 F.2d 608 (D.C.Cir.1957) (per curiam), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 913 , 78 S.Ct. 344 , 2 L.Ed.2d 274 (1958); Hoffer II, 797 F.2d at 352 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Purdom
v.
United States
No. 603.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 6, 1958.
355 U.S. 913
Joseph P. Jenkins for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.