green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas Lasorsa and Salvatore Caio
See Connelly v. United States, 249 F.2d 576 (8 Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 700 , 2 L.Ed.2d 716 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Brent v. Wingate White, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
See Application of Woods, N.D.Cal.1957, 154 F.Supp. 932 , cert. denied, Woods v. Heinze, 1958, 356 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 705 , 2 L.Ed.2d 716 .
cited
Cited "see"
Isadore Blumenfield v. United States of America, (Two Cases). Monte Perkins v. United States
See Connelly v. United States, 8 Cir., 249 F.2d 576, 584, 585 , certiorari denied Caudle v. U. S., 356 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 700 , 2 L.Ed.2d 716 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alvarado v. State
See, e. g., Connelly v. United States, 249 F.2d 576 (8th Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 700 , 2 L.Ed.2d 716 (1958) ; Myers v. United States, 15 E.2d 977 (8th Cir. 1926) ; Spencer v. United States, 169 F. 562 (8th Cir. 1909) ; Maryland v. Brown, 295 F.Supp. 63 (D.Md.1969) ; Commonwealth v. Reilly, 324 Pa. 558 , 188 A. 574 (1936) ; Newberry v. Commonwealth, 192 Va. 819 , 66 S.E.2d 841 (1951). 39 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Caudle
v.
United States and Connelly v. United States
v.
United States and Connelly v. United States
No. 738; No. 739.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 31, 1958.
C. Arthur Anderson and John J. Hooker for petitioner in No. 738. Jacob M. Lashly, John H. Lashly, Paul B. Rava and Alan Y. Cole for petitioner in No. 739., Solicitor General Rankin, Roger Fisher and Carl H. Imlay for the United States.
Applications, Clark, Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petitions should be granted. Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.Reported below: 249 F. 2d 576.