green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Northern California Pharmaceutical Association, a Corporation, and Donald K. Hedgpeth v. United States
Appellants also allege as error an expression of the opinion of the trial judge as to the existence of interstate commerce in the case. 14 Of course it is in the province of a federal trial judge to comment fairly on the evidence, so long as he leaves to the jury “the final decision and the power to disregard his remarks.” Duke v. United States, 255 F.2d 721 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U. S. 920 , 78 S.Ct. 1361 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 *388 (1958) 15 This is especially true where, as here, the issue is very nearly a mixed question of fact and law.
cited
Cited "see"
Tracy Ray Vaughan, and Mark Koch, Donald Nelson, and Mark Osborne v. James Ricketts
See Duke v. United States, 255 F.2d 721, 724-26 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 357 U.S. 920 , 78 S.Ct. 1361 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958).
examined
Cited "see"
Elder v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
(3×)
See Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America, et al., 251 F.2d 930 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958).
examined
Cited "see"
Wolf v. Regardie
(3×)
See Jenkins v. Dell Publishing Co., 143 F.Supp. 952, 955 (W.D.Pa.1956), aff'd, 251 F.2d 447 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); Intrusion, supra, 55 Iowa L.Rev. at 720 n. 30 (collecting cases).
examined
Cited "see"
Fletcher v. Advo Systems, Inc.
(3×)
See, generally, Wright & Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure, §§ 1682, 1685 (1972). 8 . 251 F.2d 930 (5th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958). 9 .
examined
Cited "see"
Jackie Collins Lerman v. Flynt Distributing Co., Inc.
(6×)
Accord, Jenkins v. Dell Publishing Co., 251 F.2d 447 , 451 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); Goelet v. Confidential, Inc., 5 A.D.2d 226, 229 , 171 N.Y.S.2d 223 (1st Dep't 1958) (magazine capitalizing on intimate details of lives of prominent individuals).
examined
Cited "see"
Hale v. Tata Corp.
(3×)
See Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, 251 F.2d 930, 934 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958).
examined
Cited "see"
Goldman v. Time, Inc.
(3×)
See Jenkins v. Dell Publishing Company, 251 F.2d 447 , 451 (3d Cir. 1958), cert. den., 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); Cordell v. Detective Publications, Inc., supra, 307 F.Supp. at 1220 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Trump v. O'BRIEN
(3×)
See also Jenkins v. Dell Publ'g Co., 251 F. 2d 447 , 451 (3d Cir.) ("Once the character of an item as news is established, it is neither feasible nor desirable for a court to make a distinction between news for information and news for entertainment in determining the extent to which publication is privileged."), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 1365 (1958).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Peterson v. BMI Refractories, Inc.
(3×)
Dukes v. South Carolina Insurance Company, 770 F.2d 545 (5th Cir.1985); Adair Pipeline Co. v. Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, 203 F.Supp. 434 (S.D.Tex.1962), aff'd, 325 F.2d 206 (5th Cir.1963); see also Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Co., 251 F.2d 930, 933 (5th Cir.) {citing Mackay v. Uinta Development Co., 229 U.S. 173 , 33 S.Ct. 638 , 57 L.Ed. 1138 (1913)), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); 14A Wright, Miller & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3736, at 548 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1089, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6281, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,701 United States of America v. Guy W. Olano, Jr., United States of America v. Raymond M. Gray
See, e.g., Duke v. United States, 255 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.) (defendant represented by attorney has no right to make opening statement where he could assist his attorney prior to trial), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 920 , 78 S.Ct. 1361 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Olano
See, e.g., Duke v. United States, 255 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.) (defendant represented by attorney has no right to make opening statement where he could assist his attorney prior to trial), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 920 , 78 S.Ct. 1361 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Alley
(3×)
See, e.g., Riehl v. National Mutual Insurance Co., 374 F.2d 739, 742 (7th Cir.1967), and Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, 251 F.2d 930, 933 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); but see Sheet Metal Workers, 693 F.2d at 1005 & 1005 n. 7 (suggesting that procedural defects may be grounds for remand).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, and Successor to the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City v. Honorable Wayne E. Alley, United States District Judge for the Western District of Oklahoma, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City v. Honorable Wayne E. Alley, United States District Judge for the Western District of Oklahoma, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City v. McClain County National Bank of Purcell, a National Banking Association First State Bank of Blanchard, a State Banking Association Reece & Gray, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation E.R. Reece, an Individual Richard A. Gray, an Individual, Defendants-Counterclaimants-Appellees. William E. Crump, III v. William D. Vaughan William B. Vaughan Ellis Lindsey D.B. Mayberry Glendol Garrett Olen Treadway Wynnewood Bancshares, Inc. J.E. Epperson D.B. Mayberry, Defendant-Third-Party and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of the First National Bankand Trust Company of Oklahoma City v. Marvin Acree, Third-Party
(3×)
See, e.g., Riehl v. National Mutual Insurance Co., 374 F.2d 739, 742 (7th Cir.1967), and Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, 251 F.2d 930, 933 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); but see Sheet Metal Workers, 693 F.2d at 1005 & 1005 n. 7 (suggesting that procedural defects may be grounds for remand).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Gary Dukes and Thomas E. Barber, D/B/A D & B Dozer Service v. South Carolina Insurance Company
(3×)
Adair Pipeline Co. v. Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, 203 F.Supp. 434 (S.D.Tex.1962), aff'd, 325 F.2d 206 (5th Cir.1963); see also Covington v. Indemnity Insurance Co., 251 F.2d 930, 933 (5th Cir.1958) (citing Mackay v. Uinta Development Co., 229 U.S. 173 , 33 S.Ct. 638 , 57 L.Ed. 1138 (1913)), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 921 , 78 S.Ct. 1362 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1365 (1958); Wright, Miller *548 & Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3736, at 548 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Covington
v.
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
v.
Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America
No. 618.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1958.
Richard E. McDaniel for petitioner. J. Austin Barnes for respondents.
Cited by 81 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.