Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed. of Jefferson Cty., 358 U.S. 101 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Bd. of Ed. of Jefferson Cty., 358 U.S. 101 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
290 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 30 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jones v. School Board of Alexandria (ca4, 1960-04-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
examined Cited "see" ca5 1964 (3×)
5th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Board of Education, N.D.Ala., 1958, 162 F.Supp. 372 , affirmed, 358 U.S. 101 , 79 S.Ct. 221 , 3 L.Ed.2d 145 .
examined Cited "see" Jones v. School Board of Alexandria (6×)
4th Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Board of Education, D.C., 162 F.Supp. 372 , affirmed 358 U.S. 101 , 79 S.Ct. 221 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 145 .
examined Cited "see" Jones v. School Board Of City Of Alexandria (3×)
4th Cir. · 1960 · signal: see · confidence high
See Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Board of Education, D.C., 162 F.Supp. 372 , affirmed 358 U.S. 101 , 79 S.Ct. 221 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 145 .
discussed Cited "see" Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. City of Chicago
N.D. Ill. · 1959 · signal: see · confidence high
See separate opinion of Judge Dye in Kingsley International Pictures Corporation v. Regents, 1958, 4 N.Y.2d 349 , 175 N.Y.S. 2d 39 , 151 N.E.2d 197 , appeal pending United States Supreme Court, 358 U.S. 897 , 79 S.Ct. 221 , 3 L.Ed.2d 147 .
examined Cited "see, e.g." Downs v. Board of Education of Kansas City (3×)
10th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham Board of Education, 162 F.Supp. 372 (N.D.Ala.1958), aff’d, 358 U.S. 101 , 79 S.Ct. 221 , 3 L.Ed.2d 145 . .
SHUTTLESWORTH Et Al.
v.
BIRMINGHAM BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA
341.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 24, 1958.
358 U.S. 101
James M. Nabrit, Jr., for appellants., Ormond Somerville, Reid B. Barnes and Jos. F. Johnston for appellee.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 81 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed upon the limited grounds on which the District Court rested its decision. 162 F. Supp. 372, 384.