green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph M. Silverman, Inc. v. Harrison
Howard University v. Best, 484 A.2d 958, 967 (D.C.1984); see Georgetown Entertainment Corp. v. District of Columbia, 496 A.2d 587, 590 (D.C.1985) (citing United States v. McShain, Inc., 103 U.S.App.D.C. 328 , 330-31, 258 F.2d 422, 424-25 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 52 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh Brown
See Hills v. Eisenhart, 156 F.Supp. 902 (N.D.Cal. 1957), aff'd, 256 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. den., 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 , reh'g den., 358 U.S. 914 , 79 S.Ct. 228 , 3 L.Ed.2d 235 4 This statement must be qualified with the exceptions set forth in Sec. 10(c) itself, discussed infra 5 "The last clause of section 10(c) relates to two situations.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.
See Hills v. Eisenhart, 156 F.Supp. 902 (N.D.Cal. 1957) , aff’d, 256 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1958) , cert. den., 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 , reh’g den., 358 U.S. 914 , 79 S.Ct. 228 , 3 L.Ed.2d 235 . .
discussed
Cited "see"
King Enterprises, Inc. v. The United States
See Idaho Power Co. v. United States, 161 F. Supp. 807 , 142 Ct.Cl. 534 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 (1958); Hawkinson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 235 F.2d 747 (2d Cir. 1956); Ross v. United States, 173 F. Supp. 793 , 146 Ct.Cl. 223 (1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 875 , 80 S.Ct. 138 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 113 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery v. Rumsfeld
Compare Acfalle v. United States, 438 F.2d 913, 914 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 857 , 92 S.Ct. 104 , 30 L.Ed.2d 99 (1971) and Hills v. Eisenhart, 256 F.2d 609 , 611 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 (1958) with Kale v. United States, 489 F.2d 449, 454 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 2617 , 41 L.Ed.2d 220 (1974) and Krieger v. Terry, 413 F.2d 73, 75-76 (9th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery v. Rumsfeld
Compare Acfalle v. United States, 438 F.2d 913, 914 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 857 , 92 S.Ct. 104 , 30 L.Ed.2d 99 (1971) and Hills v. Eisenhart, 256 F.2d 609 , 611 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 832 , 79 S.Ct. 53 , 3 L.Ed.2d 70 (1958) with Kale v. United States, 489 F.2d 449, 454 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 915 , 94 S.Ct. 2617 , 41 L.Ed.2d 220 (1974) and Krieger v. Terry, 413 F.2d 73 , 75-76 (9th Cir. 1969). 6 We believe recent Supreme Court decisions provide guidance in determining the jurisdictional implications of the exhaustion of remedies doctrine.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lyddon & Co. (America) Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 241.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1958.
Harold Manheim, Meyer Grouf and Robert Braunschweig for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and L. W. Post for the United States.
Published
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.