Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. United States, 358 U.S. 835 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Schenley Distillers, Inc. v. United States, 358 U.S. 835 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
54 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 27 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (ca8, 2018-12-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Org. for Competitive Markets v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
8th Cir. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
Thus, whether petitioners' claim is reviewed under § 706(1) or as a petition for a writ of mandamus under the All Writs Act, their argument that this court must compel agency action fails. 5 "The issuance of a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy reserved for extraordinary situations." In re MidAmerican Energy Co. , 286 F.3d 483 , 486 (8th Cir. 2002) ; see Hvass v. Graven , 257 F.2d 1 , 6 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 58 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" LINI, Inc. v. Schachter (In Re Schachter)
Bankr. E.D. Pa. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. American Nat’l Bank, 255 F.2d 504, 506 (5th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 58 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958); In re Himmelstein, 203 B.R. 1009, 1013, 1015-16 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1996); and Meyer v. Faust, 83 So.2d 847, 848 (Fla.1955).
cited Cited "see" James W. Barrett Friends of James W. Barrett Committee Dionne Thomas, Treasurer, Friends of James W. Barrett Committee v. Mitchell J. Brown City of Cleveland
6th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hvass v. Graven, 257 F.2d 1, 4 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" Hodgson v. Hyatt Realty & Investment Co.
M.D.N.C. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schenley Distillers v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 898, 904 (W.D.Pa. 1957), aff’d, 255 F.2d 334 (3rd Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 57 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958), for definitions of an excise tax.
discussed Cited "see" Hodgson v. HYATT REALTY AND INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC.
M.D.N.C. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Schenley Distillers v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 898, 904 (W.D.Pa. 1957), aff'd, 255 F.2d 334 (3rd Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 835 , 79 S.Ct. 57 , 3 L.Ed.2d 72 (1958), for definitions of an excise tax.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schenley Distillers, Inc.
v.
United States
No. 257.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 13, 1958.
358 U.S. 835
Elder W. Marshall and Thomas E. Dewey for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Melva M. Graney and Grant W. Wiprud for the United States.
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.