green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
HOBBS v. AMERICAN COMMERCIAL BARGE LINE LLC
See 257 F.2d 316, 320 (7th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 (1958); see also Smith v. Apex Towing Co., 949 F. Supp. 667, 671 (N.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Reid v. City of New York
See Bell v. United States, 254 F.2d 82, 87 (D.C.Cir.1958), cert denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 ; Cf New York Criminal Procedure Law § 70.10 (defining reasonable cause).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailey v. Greenberg
See Benton v. Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, 255 F.2d 299, 301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 123 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958); Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Moyer, 113 F.2d 974, 981-82 (3d Cir.1940); Jackson v. Andco Farms, 130 Cal.App.3d 475 , 181 Cal.Rptr. 815, 818 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Cyr v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
See Benton v. Elkins, Weems and Searls, 255 F.2d 299 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 123 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
Leinberger v. Webster
See Benton v. Elkins, Weems and Searls, 255 F.2d 299 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 123 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958); Headrick v. Atchison, T.
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. United States
(2×)
See Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958); Allen v. United States, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 61 , 390 F.2d 476 (1968), motion to modify opinion denied, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 358 , 404 F.2d 1335 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sammie Jackson, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958).
cited
Cited "see"
James W. Robinson v. United States of America, Thomas F. Dawson v. United States of America, Howard H. Williams v. United States
See Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , certiorari denied 1958, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Roldan
In Corrado (supra, pp 313-314 ), the court issued the following significant admonition: "In reaching our conclusion, we have not retreated in any manner from our prior decisions that a police officer is entitled to draw on his whole knowledge and experience as a criminal investigation officer (People v Valentine, supra, p 132; People v Brady, 16 NY2d 186 ; see, also, Bell v United States, 254 F 2d 82 , cert den 358 US 885 ; Jackson v United States, 302 F 2d 194, 196 ).” There is little question as to the right of the police in this case to stop the vehicle to examine the driver’s, here def…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph M. Joyner
See, e. g., Chaney v. State, 237 So.2d 281, 283 (Fla.App.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971) and Chippas v. State, 180 So.2d 355, 358 (Fla.App.1965), both citing Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. United States
(2×)
See also Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958); Jenkins v. United States, D.C.App., 284 A.2d 460 (1971); Munn v. United States, D.C.App., 283 A.2d 28 (1971). .D.C.Code 1967, § 23-581 (a) (1) (B) & (C), and (2) (A) (Supp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Klari A. Erdoss, of the Will of Akos Horvath, Deceased, Ernest v. Horvath and George A. Horvath v. Masmo, Inc. (Formerly Known as Massachusetts Mohair Plush Company, Inc.)
See also, Benton v. Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, 255 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 358 U. S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 123 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958). 10 Defendants' argument that Judge Tyler abused his discretion in failing to grant relief under Rule 60(b) (6) is also without merit.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Erdoss
See also, Benton v. Vinson, Elkins, Weems & Searls, 255 F.2d 299 (2d Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 123 , 3 L.Ed.2d 113 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Corrado
We conclude, therefore, that the testimony concerning the use of these common envelopes for marijuana does not raise the level of inference from suspicion to probable cause. 4 In reaching our conclusion, we have not retreated in any manner from our prior decisions that a police officer is entitled to draw on his whole knowledge and experience as a criminal investigation officer (People v. Valentine, supra, p. 132; People v. Brady, 16 N Y 2d 186; see, also, Bell v. United States, 254 F. 2d 82 , cert. den. 358 U. S. 885 ; Jackson v. United States, 302 F. 2d 194, 196 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Farrugia v. Bhono
Compare Bell v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 254 F.2d 82, 86 , cert, denied, 358 U.S. 885 , 79 S.Ct. 126 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 113 (1958). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benton
v.
Vinson
v.
Vinson
No. 391.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 10, 1958.
Thaddeus G. Benton for petitioner. Leo T. Kissam for Searls, respondent.
Application, Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.