Guerlain, Inc. v. United States, 358 U.S. 915 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Guerlain, Inc. v. United States, 358 U.S. 915 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 22 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Monihan v. Monihan (pa, 1970-04-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Monihan v. Monihan (2×)
Pa. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See James v. Grand Trunk Railroad Co., 14 Ill. 2d 356 , 152 N.E. 2d 858 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 915 , 79 S. Ct. 288 (1958).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Application for Pen Register & Trap/Trace Device With Cell Site Location Authority (2×)
S.D. Tex. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
See NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America, 511 U.S. 571, 582 , 114 S.Ct. 1778 , 128 L.Ed.2d 586 (1994); Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp., 496 U.S. 633, 649-50 , 110 S.Ct 2668 , 110 L.Ed.2d 579 (1990) ("It is a particularly dangerous ground on which to rest an interpretation of a prior statute when it concerns, as it does here, a proposal that does not become law”); United States v. Wise, 370 U.S. 405, 411 , 82 S.Ct. 1354 , 8 L.Ed.2d 590 (1962) ("Logically, several equally tenable inferences could be drawn from the failure of Congress to adopt an amendment in light of a…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Stambaugh v. Stambaugh (2×)
Pa. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also James v. Grand Trunk Western R.R., 14 Ill.2d 356 , 152 N.E.2d 858 , cert. denied, 358 U.S. 915 , 79 S. Ct. 288 (1958); Hammer v. Hammer, 303 N.Y. 481 , 104 N.E.2d 864 (1952); Garvin v. Garvin, 302 N.Y. 96 , 96 N.E.2d 721 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Guerlain, Inc.
v.
United States Parfums Corday, Inc. v. United States and Lanvin Parfums, Inc. v. United States
No. 24; No. 30; No. 31.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1958.
358 U.S. 915
Chauncey B. Garver and Charles C. Parlin, Jr. for appellant in No. 24. Samuel I. Rosenman, Seymour D. Lewis and Joseph L. Hochman for appellant in No. 30. Simon H. Rif kind and Walter J. Derenberg for appellant in No. 31. Solicitor General Rankin and Ralph S. Spritzer for the United States, movant-appellee. Gus-tave B. Garfield filed a brief for Rothman, as amicus curiae.
Cited by 15 opinions  |  Published

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 355 U. S. 937, 951.) The motion to vacate the judgments is granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases remanded to the District Court to enable it to consider a motion to dismiss to be filed by the United States.

Reported below: 155 F. Supp. 77.