green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Quincy College & Seminary Corp. v. Burlington Northern, Inc.
See State of New Jersey v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 324 (D.N.J.1958), aff’d per curiam, Bergen County v. United States, 359 U.S. 27 , 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 625 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Williamsport v. United States
See State of New Jersey v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 324 (D.C.1958), affirmed 359 U.S. 27 , 79 S.Ct. 607 , 3 L.Ed.2d 625 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
New Jersey v. New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad
See New Jersey v. United States, 168 F. Supp. 324 , aff’d per curiam, 359 U. S. 27 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEW JERSEY ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
621.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 2, 1959.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, for appellants in No. 621.
Milton T. Lasher, William A. Roberts, Irene Kennedy and Maxwell A. Howell for appellants in No. 622.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and Thomas E. Dewey and Gerald E. Dwyer for the New York Central Railroad Co., appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
[*] Together with No. 622, County of Bergen et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the same court.