Bohn v. United States, 360 U.S. 907 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Bohn v. United States, 360 U.S. 907 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
103 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 32 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ernest Turley v. Donald Wyrick (ca8, 1977-04-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see" Ernest Turley v. Donald Wyrick (4×)
8th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 , 79 S.Ct. 676 , 3 L.Ed.2d 684 , rehearing denied, 360 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 1283 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1258 (1959); Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187 , 79 S.Ct. 666 , 3 L.Ed.2d 729 (1959); United States v. Lanza, 260 U.S. 377 , 43 S.Ct. 141 , 67 L.Ed.2d 314 (1922).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ableman (2×)
N.J. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 , 79 S.Ct. 676 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 684 , reh. den. 360 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 1283 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 1258 (1959); Abbate v. United States, 359 U.S. 187 , 79 S.Ct. 666 , 3 L.Ed. 2d 729 (1959); State v. Cooper, 54 N.J. 330 (1969), cert. den., 396 U.S. 1021 , 90 S.Ct. 593 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 514 (1970). [4] Admittedly, the Appellate Division's opinion is ambiguous on this point.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Griffin
cma · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gundlach v United States, 262 F2d 72 (CA4th Cir) (1958), cert den, 360 US 904 , 3 L ed 2d 1255, 79 S Ct 1283 ; United States v Diggs, 304 F2d 929 (CA 6th Cir) (1962); United States v Davis, supra. This record reveals that the appel lant had completed high school, was thirty years of age and of superior intelligence, being possessed of a 143 GT score.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bohn
v.
United States, 358 U. S. 931
No. 547.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 8, 1959.
360 U.S. 907
Application, Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.