green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
John T. Witherow v. The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, a Corporation
See Iovino v. Waterson, 274 F.2d 41 , 48 n.5 (2d Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
David Leroy Daniels v. United States
See 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 859 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 . 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaftex Corporation, Third-Party v. Randolph Mills, Inc., Third-Party Gail Shawe, an Infant, by Annette Shawe and Earle K. Shawe, and Early K. Shawe v. Wendy Wilson, Inc., a Division of Lewis Frimel Co., and Jaftex Corporation
See Iovino v. Waterson, supra, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 41, 48 , certiorari denied Carlin v. Iovino, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 , upholding F.R. 25(a)(1) (substitution of parties), and D'Onofrio Const. Co. v. Recon Co., 1 Cir., 255 F.2d 904, 910 , upholding F.R. 14 (impleader), in diversity cases. 10 Actually, however, it runs counter to the rationale of Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, 350 U.S. 198, 202-203, 205-212 , 76 S.Ct. 273 , 100 L.Ed. 199 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jaftex Corp. v. Randolph Mills, Inc.
See Iovino v. Waterson, supra, 2 Cir., 274 F.2d 41, 48 , certiorari denied Carlin v. Iovino, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 860 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 , upholding F.R. 25(a) (1) (substitution of parties), and D’Onofrio Const. Co. v. Recon Co., 1 Cir., 255 F.2d 904, 910 , upholding F.R. 14 (impleader), in diversity cases. 10 Actually, however, it runs counter to the rationale of Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, 350 U.S. 198, 202-203, 205-212 , 76 S.Ct. 273 , 100 L.Ed. 199 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Petersen v. Clark
If the argument is that § 460(b) (3) merely codified existing law, this court concludes that either (1) Wolff did not represent existing law in this circuit (even in a criminal case, a defendant was not permitted to challenge his classification if he did not actually report for civilian work in lieu of military service — he had to reach that “brink”, United States v. Sutter, 127 F.Supp. 109, 117 (S.D.Cal.1954); see also Bjorson v. United States, 272 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 949 , 80 S.Ct. 859 , 4 L.Ed.2d 867 (1960); Daniels v. United States, 372 F.2d 407 (9th Cir…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Green
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 596.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1960.
362 U.S. 949
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Published
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit granted limited to question No. 3 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
“3. Whether the judgment was invalidated where the court did not offer the petitioner an opportunity to speak before sentence was imposed.”
Case transferred to the appellate docket.