green
Positive treatment
3.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
PEOPLES v. JOHNSON
See State v. Cotto, 182 N.J. 316, 333 (2005) (holding that a “defendant cannot simply seek to introduce evidence of ‘some hostile event and leave its connection with the case to mere conjecture’” (quoting State v. Sturdivant, 31 N.J. 165, 179 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 956 [(1960)])).
discussed
Cited "see"
T.F. VS. F.S. (FV-03-0797-16, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)(RECORD IMPOUNDED)
Super. 1, 7 (App. Div.), aff’d, 25 N.J. 66 (1957); see State v. Sturdivant, 31 N.J. 165, 178 (1959) (upholding the admission of additional evidence where "the trial court offered the defense an opportunity to produce surrebuttal evidence"), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 956 , 80 S. Ct. 873 , 4 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Murphy
See State v. Sturdivant, 31 N.J. 165, 176 (1959), cert. den. 362 U.S. 956 , 80 S.Ct. 873 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 873 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bobby Perry A/K/A Bobby Penny(075114)
We have long recognized that “by implication, a complete defense includes a criminal defendant’s right to introduce evidence of third-party guilt ‘if the proof offered has a rational tendency to engender a reasonable doubt with respect to an essential feature of the State’s case.’ ” State v. Cotto, 182 N.J. 316, 332 , 865 A.2d 660 (2005) (quoting Fortin, supra, 178 N.J. at 591 , 843 A.2d 974 ); see also State v. Sturdivant, 31 N.J. 165, 179 , 155 A.2d 771 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 956 , 80 S.Ct. 873 , 4 L.Ed.2d 873 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cotto
We have held that, by implication, a complete defense includes a criminal defendant’s right to introduce evidence of third-party guilt “if the proof offered has a rational tendency to engender a reasonable doubt with respect to an essential feature of the State’s case.” State v. Fortin, (Fortin II), 178 N.J. 540, 591 , 843 A.2d 974 (2004); see also State v. Sturdivant, 31 N.J. 165, 179 , 155 A.2d 771 (1959), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 956 , 80 S.Ct. 873 , 4 L.Ed.2d 873 (1960); State v. Koedatich, 112 *333 N.J. 225, 301-02, 548 A.2d 939 (1988) (noting continued viability of Sturdivant stand…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rose v. United States
See also Whiting v. Chew, 273 F.2d 885 (4th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 956 , 80 S.Ct. 872 , 4 L.Ed.2d 873 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Spinney v. Fay
See, also, Whiting v. Chew, 273 F.2d 885, 886 (4 Cir. 1960), cert. den. 362 U.S. 956 , 80 S.Ct. 872 , 4 L.Ed.2d 873 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Faiola
v.
New Jersey
v.
New Jersey
No. 630.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 18, 1960.
362 U.S. 956
Petitioner pro se., Bertram Polow for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.