green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Harada
(2×)
See Leahy v. United States, 272 F.2d 487, 489 (9th Cir.1959) (distinguishing the facts of Leahy from cases in which the occupant had voluntarily opened the door and then attempted to close it because the element of force was not present in Leahy ), cert. granted, 363 U.S. 810 , 80 S.Ct. 1246 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1152 , cert. dismissed, 364 U.S. 945 , 81 S.Ct. 465 , 5 L.Ed.2d 459 (1961); Dickey v. United States, 332 F.2d 773, 777-78 (9th Cir.) (noting that, if the officers had obtained a *182 partial opening and had forced the door open the rest of the way to gain entrance, that would have been a "break…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene J. Matelich
See Leahy v. United States, 272 F.2d 487, 488 (9th Cir. 1959), cert. granted, 363 U.S. 810 , 80 S.Ct. 1246 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1152 (1960), cert. dismissed, 364 U.S. 945 , 81 S.Ct. 465 , 5 L.Ed.2d 459 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leahy
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 816.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 6, 1960.
Arthur D. Klang for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted.