green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.7 score
“(i)t is elementary that the ruling of an administrative agency cannot stand if the conclusion or an ultimate fact does not flow rationally from subsidiary facts”
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
(i)t is elementary that the ruling of an administrative agency cannot stand if the conclusion or an ultimate fact does not flow rationally from subsidiary facts
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
t is elementary that the ruling of an administrative agency cannot stand if the conclusion or an ultimate fact does not flow rationally from subsidiary facts
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 283 F.2d 204 , 224 (D.C.Cir.) (proposal that was ineffective as settlement nonetheless “appears prima facie to have merit enough to have required the Commission at some stage of the proceeding to consider it on its own initiative as an alternative to total abandonment”), ce rt. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Shell Western E & P, Inc., Associated Gas Distributors, Felmont Oil Corp. & Esse Offshore, Inc., Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Shell Western E & P, Inc., Associated Gas Distributors, Felmont Oil Corp. & Esse Offshore, Inc., Philadelphia Electric Company, Intervenors. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Felmont Oil Corp. & Esse Offshore, Inc., Philadelphia Electric Company, Shell Western E & P, Inc., Intervenors. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 283 F.2d 204 , 224 (D.C.Cir.) (proposal that was ineffective as settlement nonetheless "appears prima facie to have merit enough to have required the Commission at some stage of the proceeding to consider it on its own initiative as an alternative to total abandonment"), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960). 64 In any event, the FERC responded on policy grounds as well, maintaining that 65 while we think that a more liberal abandonment policy will contribute to our stated objective to introduce more competition into the gas …
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409, 425 , 283 F.2d 204 , 220, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960); Allentuck v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, D.C.App., 264 A.2d 307 , 309—10 (1970). *742 Petitioners next contend that the BZA’s conclusion regarding the impact of the campus plan on traffic in the Georgetown area is not in line with the weight of the evidence and, consequently, constitutes an abuse of discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gulf Oil Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409, 419 , 283 F.2d 204 , 214, cert. denied, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409, 419 , 283 F.2d 204 , 214, cert. denied, Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, Brick Institute of America, Intervenors. State of North Carolina and North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Federal Power Commission, Piedmont Natural Gas Co., Inc., Intervenors. Alabama Gas Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Southeast Alabama Gas District, Intervenors. Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, Intervenors
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409 , 283 F.2d 204 , cert. denied sub nom., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960). 6 Our experience with this case has left us with an appreciation of the difficult task faced by the Commission and the parties in coping with curtailments necessitated by the natural gas shortage.
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Company v. FPC, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409 , 283 F.2d 204 , cert. denied sub nom., Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co., 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aberdeen and Rockfish Railroad Co. v. United States
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409 , 283 F.2d 204 , 224, 226, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , [ 5 L.Ed.2d 227 ] (1960); Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 96 F.Supp. 883, 892 (S.D.N.Y.1951), aff’d by an equally divided court, A/S J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409 , 283 F.2d 204 , 224, 226, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 (1960); Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 96 F.Supp. 883, 892 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. Federal Power Commission
See Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409 , 283 F.2d 204 , 224, 226, cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 (1960); Isbrandtsen Co. v. United States, 96 F.Supp. 883, 892 (S.D.N.Y.1951), aff'd by an equally divided court, A/S J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rochelle
See, e. g., Santos v. United States, 277 F.2d 806 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 278 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (I960). 14 Instead, the rule is that the Tax Court can only determine the amount of the overpayment for the taxable year, and, in order to recover this sum from the United States, the taxpayer must bring suit in a Federal district court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of Gulf Southwestern Transportation Co., William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of Gulf Southwestern Transportation Co. v. United States
See, e. g., Santos v. United States, 277 F.2d 806 (Ct.Cl.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 278 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960). 14 Instead, the rule is that the Tax Court can only determine the amount of the overpayment for the taxable year, and, in order to recover this sum from the United States, the taxpayer must bring suit in a Federal district court.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Greater Baltimore Committee, Intervenor
Compare Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Federal Power Comm., 108 U.S.App.D.C. 409 , 283 F.2d 204 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 913 , 81 S.Ct. 276 , 5 L.Ed.2d 227 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Preformed Line Products Co.
v.
Watson, Commissioner of Patents
v.
Watson, Commissioner of Patents
No. 471.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 5, 1960.
Patrick H. Hume and C. Willard Hayes for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondent.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.