Jerrold Elec. Corp. v. United States, 365 U.S. 567 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Jerrold Elec. Corp. v. United States, 365 U.S. 567 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1982 · . . . the essential element is ... the specific intent to monopolize.... ⚠ not in text
315 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 44 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Weiss v. York Hospital (pamd, 1982-09-30) · Strongest negative: Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (scotus, 1992-06-08)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (2×)
SCOTUS · 1992 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F. Supp. 545, 560 (ED Pa. 1960), aff'd, 365 U. S. 567 (1961) (per curiam) (accepting affirmative defense to per se tying allegation).
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Weiss v. York Hospital (2×)
M.D. Penn. · 1982 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
. . . the essential element is ... the specific intent to monopolize....
discussed Cited "see" Town Sound & Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Un ited States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (per curiam), aff’g 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1961) (“per se” rule not applicable when rule of reason inquiry inexpensive and conduct that was necessary to establish a new industry was clearly reasonable while in effect).
discussed Cited "see" Town Sound And Custom Tops, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (per curiam), aff'g 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1961) ("per se" rule not applicable when rule of reason inquiry inexpensive and conduct that was necessary to establish a new industry was clearly reasonable while in effect).
discussed Cited "see" National Bancard Corporation (Nabanco), a Florida Corporation v. Visa U.S.A., Inc. (2×)
11th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 556 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff'd mem., 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" Borough of Scottdale v. National Cable Television Corp. (2×)
Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 551-52 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). .
discussed Cited "see" Hudson Valley Asbestos Corporation v. Tougher Heating & Plumbing Co., Inc. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 554 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation v. General Telephone & Electronics Corporation and Hawaiian Telephone Company (2×)
9th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff'd per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (While the government has not produced sufficient evidence of an actual violation to permit divestiture, an injunction against future acquisitions is proper.). 66 .
examined Cited "see" The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corporation, Formerly Known as the Cincinnati Times-Star Company (4×)
6th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 559, n. 25 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, per curiam, 365 U. S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 , rehearing denied, 365 U.S. 890 , 81 S.Ct. 1026 , 6 L.Ed.2d 200 .
discussed Cited "see" Vanadium Corp. of America v. Susquehanna Corporation (2×)
D. Del. · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See, too, United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., D.C.E.D.Pa., 187 F.Supp. 545 , affd. 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 . 74 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. v. Smith (2×)
E.D. Mich. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 560 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff 'd, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961)(per curiam).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Grappone, Inc. v. Subaru of New England, Inc. (2×)
1st Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960) (“tie” between equipment and installation aided success of system and growth of industry), aff'd per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." R & G Affiliates, Inc. v. Knoll International, Inc. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 559 (E.D.Penn.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). 50 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. (2×)
N.D. Cal. · 1981 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961) (installation of cable antenna tv system is a separate market from components of the antenna system) with Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 594 , 73 S.Ct. 872 (1953) (advertising in separate morning and afternoon newspapers owned by single publisher is the same market).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arthur H. Pitchford and Pitchford Scientific Instruments Corporation v. Pepi, Inc. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Anderson v. American Automotive Assoc., 454 F.2d 1240, 1244, 1246 (9th Cir. 1972). 26 . 425 F.2d 932 (3d Cir. 1970). 27 . 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), att’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961). 28 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rex Chainbelt Inc., (Cross-Appellee) v. Harco Products, Inc., Dba Dfc Company, (Cross-Appellant) (2×)
9th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Penn. 1960), aff’d 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
JERROLD ELECTRONICS CORP. Et Al.
v.
UNITED STATES
631.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1961.
365 U.S. 567
Israel Packel for appellants., Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Kirkpatrick and Richard A. Solomon for the United States.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 34 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: M.D. Pennsylvania (2)
Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Points 1 and 3, Northern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 356 U. S. 1; International Salt Co. v. United States, 332 U. S. 392. Points 2 and 6, United States v. W. T. Grant Co., 345 U. S. 629, 633. Point 4, Schine Theatres v. United States, 334 U. S. 110, 119.