Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
58 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jabree Williams (ca3, 2020-09-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Jabree Williams
3rd Cir. · 2020 · confidence medium
Van Hook is a one-sentence opinion, stating: “The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for resentencing in compliance with” Rule 32 and Green. 365 U.S. at 609.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Young (2×)
Utah · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Van Hook, 365 U.S. at 609 , 81 S.Ct. at 823 ; Mohn, 584 P.2d at 44 ; Emig, 493 P.2d at 369-70 ; Tomlinson, 647 P.2d at 417 ; Nicoletti, 471 A.2d at 618 ; see also Ashe v. State, 586 F.2d 334, 336 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 966 , 99 S.Ct. 2416 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1072 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Dishman v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609 (1961); U.S. v. Latimer, 548 F.2d 311 (10th Cir. 1977); United States v. Van Drunen, 501 F.2d 1393 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. den., 419 U.S. 1091 ; United States v. Gardner, 480 F.2d 929 (10th Cir. 1973), cert. den., 414 U.S. 977 ; United States v. Eads, 480 F.2d 131 (5th Cir. 1973). 2 We have no doubt that Maryland Rule 772 d is patterned in large part after current Federal Rule 32 (a), and that, in adopting it, the Court of Appeals was cognizant of and intended to apply in this State the concepts and procedures set forth in Green v. United States.
cited Cited "see" Eugene W. Thompson v. United States
1st Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609 , 81 S.Ct. 823 , 5 L.Ed.2d 821 (1961) (per curiam); United States v. Leavitt, supra at 1103 .
discussed Cited "see" William C. Coleman v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609 , 81 S.Ct. 823 , 5 L.Ed.2d 821 , citing Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 , 81 S.Ct. 653 , 5 L.Ed.2d 670 .
cited Cited "see" Hill v. United States
SCOTUS · 1962 · signal: see · confidence high
See Van Hook v. United States, 365 U. S. 609 , for the relief afforded on direct appeal in a case where the sentencing judge disregarded the mandate of Rule 32 (a).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Edwards (2×)
Ariz. · 1979 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Hitchcock, 87 Ariz. 277 , 350 P.2d 681 (1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 609 , 81 S.Ct. 823 , 5 L.Ed.2d 821 (1961); People v. Stamp, 2 Cal.App.3d 203 , 82 Cal.Rptr. 598 (1969), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 819 , 91 S.Ct. 36 , 27 L.Ed.2d 46 (1970); State v. McKeiver, 89 N.J.Super. 52 , 213 A.2d 320 (1965).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Merle v. Watson
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301 , 81 S.Ct. 653 , 5 L.Ed.2d 670 (1961), and Van Hook v. United States, 365 U.S. 609 , 81 S.Ct. 823 , 5 L.Ed.2d 821 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Van Hook
v.
United States
705.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 1961.
365 U.S. 609
Francis Heisler for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 30 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for resen-tencing in compliance with Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Green v. United States, 365 U. S. 301.