D'Aria v. United States, 365 U.S. 834 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
D'Aria v. United States, 365 U.S. 834 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
83 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Garrison v. State (mdctspecapp, 1984-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Garrison v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Butler v. State, 19 Md.App. 601 , 313 A.2d 554 (1974), appellant rented room in a multiunit building which he used as a “stash house.” See also, United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 (2d Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 745 , 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961).
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Erickson
Mass. App. Ct. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51, 58-59, 67 , aff’d in relevant part on rehearing en banc, 290 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1960), cert, denied, 365 U.S. 834 (1961); United States v. Dorsey, 591 F.2d 922, 925-926, 930-931 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see" People v. Germaine
N.Y. App. Div. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Based upon these facts, the search warrant complied with the requirements of specificity contained in CPL 690.45 (subd 3) {People v Fiore, 46 AD2d 814 ; see United States v Santore, 290 F2d 51, cert den 365 US 834 ; cf. People v Rainey, 14 NY2d 35 ).
cited Cited "see" State v. Nearing
Or. Ct. App. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Santore, 290 F2d 51 (2d Cir 1959), cert denied 365 US 834 , 81 S Ct 749 , 5 L Ed 2d 744 (1961); Minovitz v. United States, 298 F2d 682 (DC Cir 1962).
discussed Cited "see" Jones v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See in this connection United States v. Santore, 290 F2d 51, 67, cert. den., 365 U. S. 834 ; United States v. Poppitt, 227 FSupp. 73, 78; Hanger v. United States, 398 F2d 91, 99.
cited Cited "see" State v. Koberstein
Or. Ct. App. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Santore, 290 F2d 51 (2d Cir 1959), cert denied 365 US 834 , 81 S Ct 749 , 5 L Ed 2d 744 (1961); Minovitz v. United States, 298 F2d 682 (DC Cir 1962).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ramos
S.D.N.Y. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51, 66-67 (2d Cir. *356 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 745 , 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Williams
S.D.N.Y. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51, 66 (2 Cir.1980) cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834 , 835, 81 S.Ct. 745 , 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961) (four separate orders). 5 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mary Velardi and Frances Velardi v. Cornelius R. Walsh, Jr. And Robert L. Boek
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Initially, we note that the general rule regarding particularity is clear enough: “ ‘[i]t is enough if the description is such that the officer[s] armed with a search warrant can with reasonable effort ascertain and identify the place intended.’ ” National City Trading Corp. v. United States, 635 F.2d 1020, 1024 (2d Cir.1980) (quoting with alterations Steele v. United States, 267 U.S. 498, 503 , 45 S.Ct. 414, 416 , 69 L.Ed. 757 (1925)); see also United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51, 66-67 (2d Cir.1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834 -35, 81 S.Ct. 745 -46, 749, 752, 5 L.Ed.2d 743 -45 (196…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National City Trading Corp. v. United States
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 , 66-67 (2d Cir. 1959) (warrant describing premises as one-family house was proper, even though it actually a two-family house, when outward appearances and local registration indicated only a one-family dwelling), aff'd in part, 290 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1960) (en banc), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 745 , 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National City Trading Corp. v. United States
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 , 66-67 (2d Cir. 1959) (warrant describing premises as one-family house was proper, even though it actually a two-family house, when outward appearances and local registration indicated only a one-family dwelling), aff’d in part, 290 F.2d 74 (2d Cir. 1960) (en banc), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 745 , 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Salvador Pardo-Bolland and Rene Bruchon
2d Cir. · 1965 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Santore, 290 F.2d 51 , 60-61 (2 Cir.), rehearing en banc, 290 F.2d 74 (1960), cert. den. 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 745 , 5 L.Ed.2d 743 (1961); Covarrubias v. United States, 290 F.2d 157, 158 (9 Cir.), cert. den. 368 U.S. 859 , 82 S.Ct. 101 , 7 L.Ed.2d 56 (1961); United States v. Buonanno, 290 F.2d 585, 586 (2 Cir. 1961); Teasley v. United States, 292 F.2d 460, 467-468 (9 Cir. 1961); Ramirez v. United States, 294 F.2d 277, 283 (9 Cir. 1961); United States v. Ladson, 294 F.2d 535, 540-541 (2 Cir. 1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 824 , 82 S.Ct. 840 , 7 L.Ed.2d 789 (1962); Hernan…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ratushny
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1964 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Santore, 290 F. 2 d 51, 66-67 (2 Cir. 1960), cert. denied 365 U.S. 834 , 81 S.Ct. 749 , 5 L.Ed. 2 d 744 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
D'Aria
v.
United States Lo Piccolo v. United States Santore v. United States Orlando v. United States and Santore v. United States
No. 16; No. 648; No. 5; No. 6; No. 635.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 6, 1961.
365 U.S. 834
Menahem Stim and Allen S. Stim for petitioners in No. 16., Maurice Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 648., Petitioners pro se in Nos. 5, Mise., and 6, Mise., Edward Q. Carr, Jr. for petitioner in No. 635, Mise., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States in Nos. 16, 5, Mise., and 6, Mise., Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Foley, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States in Nos. 648 and 635, Mise.
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Reported below: 290 F. 2d 51.