Baldonado v. California, 366 U.S. 417 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Baldonado v. California, 366 U.S. 417 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Cisneros, 34 Cal. App. 3d 399 (Cal. Ct. App. 1973)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
q1 “the totality of circumstances disclosed fails to support the substantial due process issues tendered in the petitions for certiorari. . . .”0 citing cases1 citing court quotes it
    Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
    Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
    BALDONADO
    v.
    CALIFORNIA.
    185.
    Supreme Court of the United States.
    May 22, 1961.
    Published opinion
    366 U.S. 417
    1961 U.S. LEXIS 1116
    Per Curiam.
    Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
    CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.

    A. L. Wirin argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioners in all three cases. Burt M. Henson argued the cause and appeared on the brief for petitioner in No. 186. Arthur Warner argued the cause and appeared on the brief for petitioner in No. 187.

    William E. James, Assistant Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent in all three cases. With him on the briefs was Stanley Mosk, Attorney General. Roy A. Gustafson also appeared on the brief for respondent in No. 187.

    Ben Margolis and Charles B. Stewart, Jr. filed a brief in No. 187 for certain California Chapters of the National Lawyers Guild, as amici curiae, urging reversal.

    PER CURIAM.

    After hearing oral argument and on due examination of the records, we conclude that the totality of circumstances disclosed fails to support the substantial due process issues tendered in the petitions for certiorari, and so we dismiss the writs.

    [*] Together with No. 186, Moya v. California, and No. 187, Duncan v. California, also on certiorari to the same Court.