green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Jim Zender, Doing Business as \Z\" Tomato Company
See United Air LInes, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302, 306 (9th Cir. 1961), cert denied, 366 U.S. 924 (1962); Cal. Clv.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Coffee Cupboard, Inc.
See Chereton v. United States, 286 F.2d 409, 413 (6th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1351 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961); In re Fearn, 96 B.R. 135, 137 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1989); In re Vantage, 34 B.R. 650, 651 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Myers v. Boeing Company
(2×)
See United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9th Cir.) (reversing trial court order bifurcating a trial when exemplary damages are sought), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 (1961). *147 I would hold, therefore, that bifurcation is an abuse of discretion absent a determination that the trials will be held in one jurisdiction.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Fearn
See, Chereton v. United States, 286 F.2d 409, 413 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1351 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Northern Paiute Nation v. United States
See Crow Tribe of Indians v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 281, 284 , 284 F.2d 361, 363 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Payton v. Abbott Labs
See United Air Lines v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302, 306 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sioux Tribe v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Crow Trite of Indians v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 281, 285-91 , 284 F. 2d 361, 364-67 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 (1961); Crow Nation v. United States, 81 Ct. Cl. 238, 242-48 (1935); Indians of the Tort Berthold Reservation v. United States, 71 Ct. Cl. 308, 311-16, 330-33 (1930); Sioux Nation v. United States, 24 Ind. Cl.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cherokee Nation
See Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, 281 F.2d 202, 208 , 150 Ct.Cl. 725, 736 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1350 , 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961). .
cited
Cited "see"
Schine v. Schine
See United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Schine v. Schine
See United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Whitefoot v. United States
See Crow Tribe of Indians v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 281 , 284 F. 2d 361 , cert. denied 366 U.S. 924 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. New York
See, e.g., Crow Tribe v. United States, 151 Ct.Cl. 281 , 284 F.2d 361 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1350 , 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961); Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 725 , 281 F.2d 202 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1350 , 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961), overruled in part on other grounds by Pawnee Indian Tribe v. United States, 157 Ct.Cl. 134, 301 F.2d 667 , cert. denied, 370 U.S. 918 , 82 S.Ct. 1556 , 8 L.Ed.2d 498 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaede v. District Court ex rel. Eighth Judicial District
See also United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gaede v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR EIGHTH JUD. DIST.
See also United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation
See also United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hasbrouck v. Texaco, Inc.
Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co., 283 U.S. 494 , 51 S.Ct. 513 , 75 L.Ed. 1188 (1931); Heckman v. Federal Press Co., 587 F.2d 612 (3d Cir. 1978); see also United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961) (reversing a bifurcation order).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hasbrouck v. Texaco
Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co., 283 U.S. 494 , 51 S.Ct. 513 , 75 L.Ed. 1188 (1931); Heckman v. Federal Press Co., 587 F.2d 612 (3d Cir. 1978); see also United Air Lines, Inc. v. Wiener, 286 F.2d 302 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1352 , 6 L.Ed.2d 384 (1961) (reversing a bifurcation order).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montana v. United States
See also n. 7, infra. [3] See generally United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians, 448 U. S. 371, 380, n. 11 (1980) (discussing federal reservation policy). [4] The history of the events leading up to the Fort Laramie Treaty of 1851 is recounted in detail in Crow Tribe of Indians v. United States. 151 Ct. Cl. 281 , 284 F. 2d 361 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U. S. 924 (1961); Crow Nation v. United States, 81 Ct. Cl. 238 (1935); and Fort Berthold Indians v. United States, 71 Ct. Cl. 308 (1930). [5] According to an account published in the Saint Louis Republican, Oct. 26, 1851, Treaty Commissioner Mi…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Prairie Band of the Pottawatomie Tribe v. United States
See also United States v. Absentee Shawnee Tribe, 151 Ct. Cl. 700 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 (1961) (per curiam order).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana v. The United States
Compare Pawnee Indian Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, 301 F.2d 667 , 157 Ct.Cl. 134, 139 , cert. denied, 370 U.S. 918 , 82 S.Ct. 1556 , 8 L.Ed.2d 498 (1962), (overruling Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States, 281 F.2d 202 , 150 Ct.Cl. 725, 735 (1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 924 , 81 S.Ct. 1350 , 6 L.Ed.2d 383 (1961). 38 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma United States v. Crow Tribe of Indians and United States v. Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
v.
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma United States v. Crow Tribe of Indians and United States v. Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
No. 861; No. 862; No. 863.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 15, 1961.
Solicitor General Cox and Roger P. Marquis for the United States. Edwin A. Rothschild, Edward P. Morse and Walter H. Maloney for respondents in No. 861. John W. Cragun and John M. Schütz for respondent in No. 862. Jack Joseph and Louis L. Rochmes for respondents in No. 863.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.