green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“he process is surely rather one of accommodation, entirely familiar in many areas of overlapping state and federal concern....”
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Milstead v. Diamond M Offshore, Inc.
he process is surely rather one of accommodation, entirely familiar in many areas of overlapping state and federal concern....
cited
Cited "see"
J.A.R., Inc. v. M/v Lady Lucille, the Dinner Cruise/excursion Vessel, Etc., Network Marine, Inc.
See Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365 U.S. 731, 735 , 81 S.Ct. 886, 890 , 6 L.Ed.2d 56 , reh’g denied, 366 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 1657 , 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961); see also East River S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Jeannette Paper Co. v. Longview Fibre Co.
See Segriff v. Johnston, 402 Pa. 109 , 166 A.2d 496 (1960), cert. denied 366 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 1669 , 6 L.Ed.2d 851 (1961) on *164 the scope of review in such circumstances.
cited
Cited "see"
Occidental Of Umm Al Qaywayn, Inc. v. A Certain Cargo Of Petroleum Laden Aboard The Tanker Dauntless Colocotronis
See Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365 U.S. 731 , 81 S.Ct. 886 , 6 L.Ed.2d 56 , reh. denied, 366 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 1657 , 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Loftin & Woodard, Inc. v. United States
See Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365 U.S. 731 , 81 S.Ct. 886 , 6 L.Ed.2d 56 , reh. denied, 366 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 1657 , 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
J.A.R., INC., Plaintiff– v. M/V LADY LUCILLE, the Dinner Cruise/Excursion Vessel, etc., et al
See Kossick v. United Fruit Co., 365 U.S. 731, 735 , 81 S.Ct. 886, 890 , 6 L.Ed.2d 56 , reh'g denied, 366 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 886 , 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961); see also East River S.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Calvin L. Ricks v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., Jackson v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 233 , 237, 285 F.2d 675, 679 (1950), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 1666 , 6 L.Ed.2d 852 (1961); Goldsmith v. United States, supra note 8. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Typographical Union, AFL-CIO
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 340.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 29, 1961.
Call, Consideration, Harlan, Response, Rule, Took.
Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Louisiana (1)
365 U. S. 705. Petition for rehearing or to remand judgment denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice[*942] Whittaker would call for a response. See Rule 58 (3). Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.