green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Maxey v. Texas Commerce Bank of Lubbock
(2×)
See United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 286 F.2d 398 (5th Cir.1961) ce rt. denied, 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Benjamin Ginsberg v. United States
(2×)
See Carlo v. United States, 286 F.2d 841, 848-849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1672 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (1961) ; Field v. United States, 263 F.2d 758, 762 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 918 , 79 S.Ct. 1436 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1534 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bell
(2×)
See United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 286 F.2d 398, 407-409 (5 Cir. 1961), cert. denied 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 ; p. 640 of 84 S.Ct.; United States v. Bobinski, 244 F.2d 299, 301 (2 Cir. 1957); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, Par. 71A.90(3) (2d ed. 1955). 14 The judgment is vacated and the case remanded.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bell
(2×)
See United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 286 F.2d 398, 407-409 (5 Cir. 1961), cert. denied 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 ; p. 640 of 84 S.Ct.; United States v. Bobinski, 244 F.2d 299, 301 (2 Cir. 1957); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, Par. 71A.90[3] (2d ed. 1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Whitehurst
(2×)
See United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 5 Cir., 286 F.2d 398, 407 , cert. den. 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 * * * There was no testimony whatever about comparable investments.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Grayson M. Whitehurst, Owner of Parcel No. 51, in the Matter of United States of America v. 3,380 Acres of Land, More or Less, Princess Anne County, Virginia, and John H. James
(2×)
See United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 5 Cir., 286 F.2d 398, 407 , cert. den. 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 * * *.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barbanell
(2×)
See Carlo v. United States, 286 F.2d 841 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1672 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (1961); United States v. Stern, 225 F.Supp. 187 (S.D.N.Y.1964). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. 158.76 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in the Town of Townshend, Windham County, State of Vermont, and Janet Hoadley Jacques
(2×)
See United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 5 Cir., 286 F.2d 398, 407 , cert. den. 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (June 5, 1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., United States ex rel Fletcher v. Cavell, 287 F.2d 792 (3d Cir.) cert. denied 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1672 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (1961). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Squella-Avendano
(2×)
See, e. g., Carlo v. United States, 286 F.2d 841 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1672 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 ; Dailey v. United States, 261 F.2d 870 (5tli Cir. 1958) cert. denied 359 U.S. 969 , 79 S.Ct. 881 , 3 L.Ed.2d 836 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Certain Interests In Property In The Borough Of Brooklyn
(2×)
See also United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 286 F.2d 398, 401 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (1961); Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United States, 281 F.2d 476, 478 (10th Cir. 1960). 14 Defendants assert, in reliance on Fairfield Gardens, Inc. v. United States, 306 F.2d 167 (9th Cir. 1962), that reproduction cost may be admitted for its indirect effect as background for an expert's testimony.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Certain Interests in Property in Borough of Brooklyn
(2×)
See also United States v. Leavell & Ponder, Inc., 286 F.2d 398, 401 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (1961); Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United States, 281 F.2d 476, 478 (10th Cir. 1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jesse C. Vick v. United States
(2×)
See also Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413 , 48 S.Ct. 373 , 72 L.Ed. 632 (1928) and Carlo v. United States, 286 F.2d 841, 849 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 1672 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 (1961). *381 In these circumstances an order will be entered dismissing the appeal as frivolous and as having been improvidently granted at government expense.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tampa Bay Garden Apartments, Inc. And Tampa Bay Manor, Inc.
See also United States v. Leavell & Ponder, 5 Cir., 1961, 286 F.2d 398 , certiorari denied 306 U.S. 945 , 81 S.Ct. 1674 , 6 L.Ed.2d 855 ; Buena Vista Homes, Inc. v. United States, 10 Cir., 281 F.2d 476 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Leavell & Ponder, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 921.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 1961.
Eugene T. Edwards for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis and A. Donald Mileur for the United States.
Cited by 67 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.