green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Heath Consultants, Inc. v. Precision Instruments, Inc.
(2×)
Accord Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Company, 286 F.2d 832 (4th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Metrix Warehouse, Inc. v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, and Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. Carl Schwartz, Third-Party Motor and Equipment Manufacturers Association Automotive Service Industry Association Automotive Parts and Accessories Association Automotive Warehouse Distributors Association, Amicus Curiae. Metrix Warehouse, Inc. v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft, and Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. Carl Schwartz, Motor & Equipment Manufactureres Association Automotive Service Industry Association Automotive Parts & Accessories Association Automotive Warehouse Distributors Association, Amicus Curiae
See Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Co., 286 F.2d 832, 840 (4th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1961); see also Phillips v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 602 F.2d 616, 628-29 (4th Cir.1979); Advance Business Systems, 415 F.2d at 62-63 . 10 15 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Metrix Warehouse, Inc. v. Daimler-Benz Aktiengesellschaft
See Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Co., 286 F.2d 832, 840 (4th Cir.1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1961); see also Phillips v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp., 602 F.2d 616, 628-29 (4th Cir.1979); Advance Business Systems, 415 F.2d at 62-63 . . 15 U.S.C. § 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Unijax, Inc. v. Champion International, Inc.
See Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Co., 286 F.2d 832, 836 (4th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1961), on remand, 207 F.Supp. 856 (D.Md.1962), rev’d on other grounds, 324 F.2d 566 (4th Cir. 1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Company v. Sealy, Inc.
See Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Co., 286 F.2d 832 (4th Cir. 1960), Cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1961), a case very similar to this one. 47 Regarding mattress spring units, Sealy takes the position that an essential element of a tying case is proof of actual foreclosure of competition.
cited
Cited "see"
Ohio-Sealy Mattress Manufacturing Co. v. Sealy, Inc.
See Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Co., 286 F.2d 832 (4th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1961), a case very similar to this one.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Nationwide Industries, Inc.
See Osborn v. Sinclair Refining Co., 286 F.2d 832 (4th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1255 .
cited
Cited "see"
Josephine Greci v. John A. Birknes, Jr.
See Application of D’Amico, 185 F.Supp. 925 , 930 n.6 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 286 F.2d 320 (2d Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 963 , 81 S.Ct. 1924 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1254 (1961). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeJesus
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 960.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 19, 1961.
366 U.S. 963
Barry Golomb for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.