green
Positive treatment
6.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Lord v. Parisi
See id. at 334 (citing Clagett v. Dacy, 47 Md App 23, 420 A2d 1285 (1980)). 5 The case most frequently cited for this rule is Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal 2d 583, 364 P2d 685 (1961), cert den 368 US 987 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Sandler, Balkin, Hellman & Weinstein, P.C.
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 588 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 364 P.2d 685, 688 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Needham v. Hamilton, 459 A.2d 1060, 1063 (D.C.App.1983).
examined
Cited "see"
Barcelo v. Elliott
(4×)
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 825 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Stowe v. Smith, 184 Conn. 194 , 441 A.2d 81, 83 (1981); Needham v. Hamilton, 459 A.2d 1060, 1062 (D.C.1983); DeMaris v. Asti 426 So.2d 1153, 1154 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1983); Ogle v. Fuiten, 102 Ill.2d 356 , 80 Ill.Dec. 772, 774-75 , 466 N.E.2d 224, 226-27 (1984); Walker v. Lawson, 526 N.E.2d 968, 968 (Ind. 1988); Schreiner v. Scoville, 410 N.W.2d 679, 682 (Iowa 1987); Pizel v. Zuspann, 247 Kan. 54 , 795 P.2d 42, 51 (1990); In re Killingsworth, 292 S…
discussed
Cited "see"
Barner v. Sheldon
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal. 2d 583 , 15 Cal. Rptr. 821 , 364 P. 2d 685, 687-688 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1962); Guy v. Liederbach, 279 Pa.Super. 543 , 421 A. 2d 333, 335 (1980), affirmed in part and reversed in part, 459 A. 2d 744 , 501 Pa. 47 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon H. Perlin Company, Incorporated Leon H. Perlin Phyllis F. Perlin, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
See Teitelbaum v. Commissioner, 294 F.2d 541, 546 (7th Cir.1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1962). 17 A distribution of property from a corporation to a shareholder with respect to its stock is a taxable dividend to the extent of the corporation's earnings. 26 U.S.C.A.
cited
Cited "see"
Leyba v. Whitley
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 588 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 364 P.2d 685, 688 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Mallen & Smith, supra, § 7.9, at 376, § 7.11, at 382.
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. BRYAN, CAVE
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583 , 15 CalRptr. 821, 364 P.2d 685 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Ogle v. Fuiten, 102 Ill.2d 356 , 80 Ill.Dec. 772 , 466 N.E.2d 224 (1984); Hale v. Groce, 304 Or. 281 , 744 P.2d 1289 (1987); Walker v. Lawson, 526 N.E.2d 968 (Ind.1988); Schreiner v. Scoville, 410 N.W.2d 679 (Iowa 1987). 3 To date, Missouri has not adopted this view.
discussed
Cited "see"
RJ Longo Const. Co. v. Schragger
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal. 2d 583 , 15 Cal. Rptr. 821 , 364 P. 2d 685, 687-688 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1962); Guy v. Liederbach, 279 Pa.Super. 543 , 421 A. 2d 333, 335 (1980), affirmed in part and reversed in part, 459 A. 2d 744 , 501 Pa. 47 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dickey v. Jansen
(2×)
See Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583 , 364 P.2d 685, 688 , 15 Cal Rptr. 821, 824 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Biakanja v. Irving, 49 Cal.2d 647 , 320 P.2d 16, 19 (1958); 45 A.L.R. at 1181-96.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'NEIL v. Bergan
Whether a complaint is based on tort or breach of contract, however, “the liability of an attorney for failure to properly perform his duties is governed by the [same] general standard of care .... ” Lysick v. Walcom, 258 Cal.App.2d 136, 147 , 65 Cal.Rptr. 406, 414 (1968); see Kirsch, supra 21 Cal.3d at 308 , 578 P.2d at 938-39 , 146 Cal.Rptr. at 222 (“These principles [governing attorney liability] are equally applicable whether the plaintiff's claim is based on tort or breach of contract”) (citing Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583, 591 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 825 (1961)) (…
discussed
Cited "see"
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis
See, Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal. 2d 583 , 15 Cal. Rptr. 821 , 364 P. 2d 685 (1961), certiorari denied, 368 U. S. 987 , 82 S. Ct. 603 , 7 L. ed. 2d 525 (1962); Heyer v. Flaig, 70 Cal. 2d 223 , 74 Cal. Rptr. 225 , 449 P. 2d 161 (1969); Licata v. Spector, 26 Conn. Supp. 378 , 225 A. 2d 28 (1966); Woodfork v. Sanders, 248 So. 2d 419 (La.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abraham Teitelbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Teitelbaum v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, decided by the Tax Court January 29, 1960 (P-H Memo T.C. par. 60,-011), affirmed 294 F.2d 541 (7th Cir. 1961), cert. denied 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 , rehearing denied 369 U.S. 842 , 82 S.Ct. 866 , 7 L.Ed.2d 846 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bonn Kraus Ginsburg and John Paul Ginsburg, Minors, by Their Guardian Ad Litem, Betty K. Ginsburg v. Paul Ginsburg
See Ginsburg v. Stern, 295 F.2d 698 (C.A.3, 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
The Nuarc Company v. Federal Trade Commission
See Swanee Paper Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, 291 F.2d 833 (2nd Cir., 1961), cert. den. 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); P. Lorillard Co. v. F. T.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Belt v. Oppenheimer, Blend, Harrison & Tate, Inc.
See, e.g., Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Ca!.2d 583, 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 (1961), cert, denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Schreiner v. Scoville, 410 N.W.2d 679, 683 (Iowa 1987). *784 The question in this case, however, is whether the Barcelo rule bars suits brought on behalf of the decedent client by his estate’s personal representatives.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 633, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1015 Ruth C. Helfand Mark Seidenberg, as Attorney-In-Fact for Ruth C. Helfand, Real Party in Interest v. Mervyn Gerson an Individual Gerson, Grekin and Wynhoff, a Professional Law Corporation
Compare Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583, 591 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 825-26 (1961) (action may be brought either in contract or in tort), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962) with Guy v. Liederbach, 501 Pa. 47, 51 , 459 A.2d 744, 749 (1983) (action is in the nature of assumpsit) 8 Because we conclude the district court did not err in awarding attorney fees to the defendants under Haw.Rev.Stat. § 607-14, we need not consider the defendants' argument that the fee award was justified under Haw.Rev.Stat. § 607-14.5 because the plaintiffs' claims were friv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Helfand v. Gerson
Compare Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583, 591 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 825-26 (1961) (action may be brought either in contract or in tort), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962) with Guy v. Liederbach, 501 Pa. 47, 51 , 459 A.2d 744, 749 (1983) (action is in the nature of as-sumpsit). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Holsapple v. McGrath
Schreiner, 410 N.W.2d at 682 ; see also Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583, 590 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 825 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chatterjee v. Glynn
See, e.g., Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583, 591 , 364 P.2d 685, 689 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1962) (dictum) (drafting a term that violated the rule against perpetuities); Ogle v. Fuiten, 112 Ill.App.3d 1048, 1052-53 , 445 N.E.2d 1344, 1347-48 (1983) (failure to insert a clause that would prevent lapse of the will); Auric v. Continental Cas.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vermont Plastics, Inc. v. Brine, Inc.
E.g., Glanzer v. Shepard, 233 N.Y. 236 , 135 N.E. 275 , 23 A.L.R. 1425 (1922) (public weigher of beans held liable to the buyer for an erroneous weight statement because the weigher knew buyer would rely on the weight statement); see also Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 364 P.2d 685 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962) (attorney whose negligence caused intended beneficiaiy of a will to be deprived of benefits of the will was liable to beneficiaiy); Rozny v. Marnul, 43 Ill.2d 54 , 250 N.E.2d 656 (1969) (surveyor whose negligence resulted in …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Logotheti v. Gordon
See, e.g., Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal. 2d 583 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1962); Ogle v. Fuiten, 112 Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conservative Club of Washington v. Finkelstein
See e.g., Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 364 P.2d 685 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962) (recognizing a cause of action for intended beneficiaries of a will against the attorney who drafted it); Vereins-Und Westbank, AG v. Carter, 691 F.Supp. 704, 715-716 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (recognizing a cause of action for the recipients of an opinion letter drafted by an attorney at the request of his client); see also Flaherty v. Weinberg, 303 Md. 116 , 492 A.2d 618 (1985) (discussing in detail attorney’s liability to third party non-clients and holdin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schreiner v. Scoville
See, e.g., Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583 , 364 P.2d 685 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Biakanja v. Irving, 49 Cal.2d 647 , 320 P.2d 16 (1958).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
Biakanja v. Irving, 49 Cal.2d 647, 650 , 320 P.2d 16, 19 (1958); see also Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal.2d 583, 589 , 15 Cal.Rptr. 821, 824 , 364 P.2d 685, 688 (1961) (holding that attorney could be liable in tort to beneficiaries of negligently *435 drawn will) (considering also whether the imposition of liability would impose an undue burden on the profession), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 , 82 S.Ct. 603 , 7 L.Ed.2d 525 (1962); Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, 57 Cal. App.3d 104, 110-11 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901, 905-06 (Cal.Ct.App.1976) (attorney who issued legal opinion which was intended to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interform Company v. Leslie L. Mitchell, D/B/A Mitchell Construction Company, and St. Paul Fire& Marine Insurance Company, Interform Company v. Leslie L. Mitchell, D/B/A Mitchell Construction Company, and St. Paul Fire& Marine Insurance Company
See Mike Bradford & Co. v. F. A. Chastain Construction Co., 387 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1968) (interpreting 40 U.S.C. § 270b(b); United States v. Benco Construction Co., 248 F.Supp. 504 (W.D.Md.1965) (same); see also United States v. Campbell, 293 F.2d 816 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1961) (interpreting 40 U.S.C. 270b(a)); United States v. Scotland Concrete Co., 294 F.Supp. 1299 (E.D.N.C.1968) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Interform Co. v. Mitchell
See Mike Bradford & Co. v. F. A. Chastain Construction Co., 387 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1968) (interpreting 40 U.S.C. § 270b(b); United States v. Benco Construction Co., 248 F.Supp. 504 (W.D.Md.1965) (same); see also United States v. Campbell, 293 F.2d 816 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 987 (1961) (interpreting 40 U.S.C. 270b(a)); United States v. Scotland Concrete Co., 294 F.Supp. 1299 (E.D.N.C.1968) (same); United States v. Continental Casualty Co., 230 F.Supp. 557 (W.D.Pa.1964) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States ex rel. Carter-Schneider-Nelson, Inc.
v.
Campbell, doing business as Campbell Construction & Equipment Co.
v.
Campbell, doing business as Campbell Construction & Equipment Co.
No. 626.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1962.
Kenneth E. Lewis for petitioner. Arthur M. Bohnert, Jr. and George H. Hauerken for respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.