green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Epstein
United States v. Martell, 335 F.2d 764, 766 (4th Cir.1964) (holding that the federal kidnapping statute is violated "regardless of the ultimate purpose of the kidnapper”); Gawne v. United States, 409 F.2d 1399, 1402-03 (9th Cir.1969) (holding that a kidnapper’s motivation is not an element of the federal kidnapping offense), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 943 , 90 S.Ct. 956 , 25 L.Ed.2d 123 (1970); Clinton v. United States, 260 F.2d 824, 825 (5th Cir.1958) (holding that the Federal Kidnapping Act does not make the kidnapper’s motivation an "ingredient of the crime”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 948…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roland R. Childress, A/K/A Rocky
(2×)
United States v. Martell, 335 F.2d 764, 766 (4th Cir.1964) (holding that the federal kidnapping statute is violated "regardless of the ultimate purpose of the kidnapper”); Gawne v. United States, 409 F.2d 1399, 1402-03 (9th Cir.1969) (holding that a kidnapper’s motivation is not an element of the federal kidnapping offense), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 943 , 90 S.Ct. 956 , 25 L.Ed.2d 123 (1970); Clinton v. United States, 260 F.2d 824, 825 (5th Cir.1958) (holding that the Federal Kidnapping Act does not make the kidnapper's motivation an "ingredient of the crime”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 948 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
Youngworth v. United States
See United States v. Roberts, 296 F.2d 198, 201 (4th Cir.1961), ce rt. denied, 369 U.S. 867 , 82 S.Ct. 1033 , 8 L.Ed.2d 85 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pleasant
See also United States v. Roberts, 296 F.2d 198, 200 (4th Cir.1961) (“The primary offices of an indictment are to inform the defendant of the offense with which he is charged with sufficient clarity to enable him to prepare his own defense, and to permit him to plead a former conviction or acquittal in bar to a subsequent indictment for the same offense”), cert. denied 369 U.S. 867 , 82 S.Ct. 1033 , 8 L.Ed.2d 85 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond Francis Bayerle
See also United States v. Roberts, 296 F.2d 198, 200-201 (4th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 867 (1962) (claimant foreclosed from raising challenge to sufficiency of indictment for first time in § 2255 motion).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Dean Atchison
See also Hayes v. United States, 8 Cir., 296 F.2d 657, 667 (1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 867 , 82 S.Ct. 1033 , 8 L.Ed.2d 85 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hayes
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 834.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 1962.
Stanley M. Rosenblum for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Published
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.