Vandersee v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 369 U.S. 876 (1962). · Go Syfert
Vandersee v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 369 U.S. 876 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
60 citation events across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins (ca2, 1974-04-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Richard Albert Jenkins
2d Cir. · 1974 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
once there is probable cause for an arrest without a warrant it is immaterial that a search precedes the arrest.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Earl K. H. Kim, Harry I. A. Ah Nee, Chester Hanawahine, Penrod S. Fanene, Catalino Gedarro, and Ralph H. Martin
9th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see · confidence high
See Busby v. United States, 296 F.2d 328 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1147 , 8 L.Ed.2d 278 (1962); Bell v. United States, supra; State v. Hanawahine, et al., supra. The next question is, whether the search following the arrest exceeded the permissible scope under the Fourth Amendment, of a search incidental to a lawful arrest? *62 Appellants contend that the search of the automobile following the arrest, and which disclosed the presence in the automobile of the weapon described in the Indictment, exceeded the permissible scope of such search under the principles announce…
cited Cited "see" Finch v. United States
10th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wise v. United States, 10 Cir., 297 F.2d 822 , cert. denied 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1148 , 8 L.Ed.2d 279 .
cited Cited "see" Finch v. United States
10th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Wise v. United States, 10 Cir., 297 F.2d 822 , cert, denied 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1148 , 8 L.Ed.2d 279 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Andrus (2×)
La. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
Rios v. United States (1960), 364 U.S. 253 , 80 S.Ct. 1431 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1688 ; see Busby v. United States (C.A.9 1961), 296 F.2d 328 , cert. den. 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1147 , 8 L.Ed. 2d 278 ; Wilson v. Porter (C.A.9 1966), 361 F.2d 412 ; see also Gilbert v. United States (C.A.9 1966), 366 F.2d 923 ; United States v. Thomas (S.D.N.Y.1966), 250 F. Supp. 771 . [6] The argument is made that there was no probable cause because the witness who reported seeing the dead calf was unknown to the state trooper and reliability of information was thus lacking.
cited Cited "see" United States ex rel. Farrugia v. Bhono
S.D.N.Y. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Busby v. United States, 296 F.2d 328, 330-331 (9th Cir. 1961), cert, denied, 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1147 , 8 L.Ed.2d 278 (1962). .
discussed Cited "see" Shipley v. State
Md. · 1966 · signal: see · confidence high
See Busby v. United States, 296 F. 2d 328, 331 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U. S. 876 (1962) (“Considering the hour of the morning, the information received and all the surrounding circumstances, the officers were perfectly justified in making inquiries of the appellants and in asking them to step out of the automobile.”); United States v. Mitchell, 179 F. Supp. 636 (D.
cited Cited "see" Goss v. State
Alaska · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See Busby v. United States, 296 F.2d 328, 331 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1147 , 8 L.Ed.2d 278 (1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Heriberto Oliveras v. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1970 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Nielsen v. Charles Kurz & Co., Inc., 295 F.2d 692 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1147 , 8 L.Ed.2d 278 (1962) (verdict cannot be attacked on appeal when plaintiff failed to make a motion for a directed verdict); Contorno v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., 278 F.2d 719 (2 Cir. 1960) (an order denying a motion for a new trial because the verdict was contrary to the weight of the evidence is not appealable absent a motion for a directed verdict).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Braxton
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1970 · signal: compare · confidence low
Super. 437, 443 (App. Div. 1965); compare Busby v. United States, 296 F. 2d 328 (9 Cir.1961), cert. den. 369 U.S. 876 , 82 S.Ct. 1147 , 8 L.Ed. 2d 278 (1962) (gun visible on back seat after driver fails to produce license).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vandersee
v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
No. 957.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1962.
369 U.S. 876
Petitioner pro se., Solicitor General Cox and Peter A. Dammann for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.