green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Dillard v. Harris
See International Longshoremen’s Association v. Georgia Ports Authority, 217 Ga. 712 , 124 S.E.2d 733 (1962), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1561 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Exxon Corporation v. Russell E. Train and Jack E. Ravan
Greater Boston Television Corp. v. FCC, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 322 , 463 F.2d 268 , 283 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 950 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 338 (1972); see Anchor Line Limited v. Federal Maritime Commission, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 40 , 299 F.2d 124, 125 , cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1563 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962); McClatchy Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 199 , 239 F.2d 19 , 23-24 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 664 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957). 12 The second branch of EPA’s finality argument consists of an assertion, closely tied to its argument on the merits, that i…
cited
Cited "see"
Wang v. REGIONAL MANPOWER ADMIN. OF US DEPT. OF LABOR
See Anchor Line Limited v. Federal Maritime Commission, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 40 , 299 F.2d 124, 125 , cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1563 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
Dalmo Sales Co. v. Tysons Corner Regional Shopping Center
U.L.Rev. 705, 752 (1962); see Young v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc., 112 U.S.App.D.C. 35 , 299 F.2d 119 (1962), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1565 , 8 L.Ed.2d 504 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anchor Line, Ltd.
See Anchor Line, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Commission, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 40 , 299 F.2d 124 (1962), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1563 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
B.J. Alan Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See id. at 542 , 90 S.Ct. at 1294 ; see also Anchor Line Ltd. v. FMC, 299 F.2d 124, 125 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1563 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
B.J. Alan Company, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
See id. at 542 , 90 S.Ct. at 1294 ; see also Anchor Line Ltd. v. FMC, 299 F.2d 124, 125 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1563 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Brown Equipment and Service Tools, Inc.
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Ballenger Paving Co., 299 F.2d 297, 300-01 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 922 , 82 S.Ct. 1565 , 8 L.Ed.2d 503 (1962). 14 A section 17 injunction provides a remedy for violation of national labor policy in a single suit initiated by the Secretary on his own volition, thus avoiding potential multiplicity of employee actions on the one hand and, on the other, the complete abandonment of their just wages by employees apprehensive of employer retaliation.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anchor Line, Ltd.
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
v.
Federal Maritime Commission
No. 913.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1962.
Ronald A. Capone, Cletus Keating and Elmer C. Maddy for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Irwin A. Seibel, Robert E. Mitchell and Edward Schmeltzer for respondents.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.