Lassiter v. United States, 371 U.S. 10 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Lassiter v. United States, 371 U.S. 10 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“petitioner is 'in 11 custody' for the purposes of habeas jurisdiction while he remains on probation.”
90 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (HC) Fawcett v. Merced County Superior Court (caed, 2020-12-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) (HC) Fawcett v. Merced County Superior Court
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
petitioner is 'in 11 custody' for the purposes of habeas jurisdiction while he remains on probation.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Emerson v. Iron Mountain Information Management Services, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2021 · confidence medium
Cal. 2005) (citing Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 10 178, 182 (1962)). 11 In evaluating plaintiff’s diligence for purposes of Rule 16, the Court considers defendants’ 12 argument that plaintiff unduly delayed in seeking the proposed amendments.
cited Cited "see" Sturdivan v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Florida Real Estate Comm’n v. Harris, 134 So.2d 785 (Fla.1961), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 7 , 83 S.Ct. 19 , 9 L.Ed.2d 47 , reh’g denied, 371 U.S. 906 , 83 S.Ct. 203 , 9 L.Ed.2d 167 (1962).
examined Cited "see" United States v. The City Of Jackson, Mississippi (4×)
5th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lassiter, 203 F.Supp. 20, 24 (W.D.La.1962), aff'd, 371 U.S. 10 , 83 S.Ct. 21 , 9 L.Ed.2d 47 (1962).
examined Cited "see" United States v. City of Jackson (4×)
5th Cir. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lassiter, 203 F.Supp. 20, 24 (W.D.La.1962), aff’d, 371 U.S. 10 , 83 S.Ct. 21 , 9 L.Ed.2d 47 (1962).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Wise v. Tucker
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1981 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Florida Real Estate Comm'n v. Harris, 134 So.2d 785 (Fla. 1961), appeal dismissed, 371 U.S. 7 , 83 S.Ct. 19 , 9 L.Ed.2d 47 (1962).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Beer v. United States (2×)
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Lassiter, 203 F.Supp. 20 (W.D.La.), aff’d, 371 U.S. 10 , 83 S.Ct. 21 , 9 L.Ed.2d 47 (1962). 268 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LASSITER ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
116.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
371 U.S. 10
Per Curiam.
Cited by 38 opinions  |  Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, George Ponder and William P. Schuler, Assistant Attorneys General, and Albin P. Lassiter for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Howard A. Glickstein and Bernard A. Gould for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.