green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.6 score
“mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some 23 act, rather than merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a 24 1 traditional tool of equity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Holthaus v. Washington Department of Corrections
mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some act, rather than 14 merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a traditional tool of 15 equity.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Davidson v. Shomer
mandatory injunctions affirmatively 5 compelling the doing of some act, rather than merely negatively forbidding continuation of a 6 course of conduct, are a traditional tool of equity.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Abdumalikov
mandatory injunctions affirmatively compelling the doing of some 23 act, rather than merely negatively forbidding continuation of a course of conduct, are a 24 1 traditional tool of equity.
cited
Cited "see"
Hopewell v. University of Pittsburgh
See Alabama v. U. S., 304 F.2d 583, 586 (5th Cir.) aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel v. Virgin Islands Telephone Corp.
See generally 3 Davis, Administrative Law § 20.07 (1958) Rather, they have the right, in my view, to bring their claims directly to this Court. 4 And this Court, in turn, may “ ‘use any available remedy to make good the ■ wrong done.’ ’’ State of Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583, 590 (5th Cir.), aff’d, 371 U.S. 37 (1962), citing, inter alia, Mitchell v. DeMario Jewelry, 361 U.S. 288 (1961) and Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678 (1946).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. State ex rel. Wallace
(2×)
See [State of] Alabama v. United States, supra ( 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 ); United States v. Thomas, 362 U.S. 58 , 80 S.Ct. 612 , 4 L.Ed.2d 535 . * * * ” .
discussed
Cited "see"
McGill v. Ryals
See Hamer et al. v. Campbell et a., supra. The “freezing” doctrine was first used in the field of voting to eliminate the effects of past discrimination, United States v. State of Alabama, 192 F.Supp. 677 (M.D.Ala.1961), aff’d 304 F.2d 583 (5th Cir.), aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962)..
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mayton
See Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir, 1962, 304 F.2d 583, 592 , aff’d mem., 1962, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 ; United States v. Manning, W.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
(2×)
See Alabama v. United States, 304 F. 2d 583 , aff'd 371 U. S. 37 ; United States v. Raines, 362 U. S. 17 ; United States v. McElveen, 180 F. Supp. 10 , aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. State of Louisiana
(2×)
See State of Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir. 1962, 304 F.2d 583 , aff’d 1962, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marine Shale Processors
United States Steelworkers of America v. United States, 361 U.S. 39, 60-61 (1959 (Frankfurter, J., concurring) (discussing the judiciary's historic use of equity powers, at the request of the sovereign, to enjoin activity found to be a public nuisance); Environmental Waste Control, 917 F.2d at 332; Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Lamphier, 714 F.2d 331, 337-38 (4th Cir. 1983); see also Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583 , 591 & n.24 (5th Cir.), aff'd, 371 U.S. 37 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, United States of America, State of Louisiana, Intervenor-Appellee v. Marine Shale Processors, Cross-Appellee
United Steelworkers of America v. United States, 361 U.S. 39, 60-61 , 80 S.Ct. 1, 4-5 , 4 L.Ed.2d 12 (1959) (Frankfurter, J., concurring) (discussing the judiciary’s historic use of equity powers, at the request of the sovereign, to enjoin activity found to be a public nuisance); Environmental Waste Control, 917 F.2d at 332; Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Lamphier, 714 F.2d 331, 337-38 (4th Cir.1983); see also Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583 , 591 & n. 24 (5th Cir.), aff'd, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randolph v. United States Elevator Corp.
See also State of Alabama v. United States, 304 F.2d 583, 587 (5th Cir. 1962), aff’d per curiam, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 (1962); Brooks v. Beto, 366 F.2d 1, 9 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. den., 1967, 386 U.S. 975 , 87 S.Ct. 1169 , 18 L.Ed.2d 135 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Blanchard McLeod United States of America v. Dallas County
See also the broad injunction against private acts of coercion and intimidation issued in United States v. Original Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, E.D.La. 1965, 250 F.Supp. 330 (3-judge). 58 In State of Alabama v. United States, 5 Cir. 1961, 304 F.2d 583 , aff'd, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 , we specifically noted the broad equity powers section 1971(c) conferred upon the federal courts.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Theron C. Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County and the State of Mississippi
See also United States v. State of Alabama, 5 Cir., 1962, 304 F.2d 583 , affirmed, 371 U.S. 37 , 83 S.Ct. 145 , 9 L.Ed.2d 112 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ALABAMA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
v.
UNITED STATES.
324.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 22, 1962.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston, Leslie Hall and Gordon Madison, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. Thomas, 362 U. S. 58.