green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Misurella v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.
See Drago v. A/S Inger, 305 F.2d 139 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, Daniels & Kennedy, Inc. v. A/S Inger 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 292 , 9 L.Ed.2d 232 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George W. Bell, Jr., James E. Brewton, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. Aerodex, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
Compare Blair, supra (back wages), Hire, supra (severance pay), and Alvado v. General Motors Corp., S.D.N.Y.1961, 194 F.Supp. 314 , aff’d, 2 Cir. 1962, 303 F.2d 718 , cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (vacation allowance pay), with Witty v. Louisville & N.R.R., 7 Cir. 1965, 342 F.2d 614 (seniority), Leonick v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 2 Cir. 1958, 258 F.2d 48 (reinstatement plus damages), and Conseglio v. Pennsylvania R.R., S.D.N.Y. 1962, 211 F.Supp. 567 (seniority).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reynolds
See also United States v. Campisi, 306 F.2d 308, 312 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962) ; 1 C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc., National Labor Relations Board v. Local 553, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
See also Alvado v. General Motors Corp., 303 F.2d 718 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962). 36 'These authorities establish the principle that a union does not violate Section 8(b)(2) unless the discrimination which the union seeks would constitute a violation of Section 8(a)(3) if the employer acted without union suggestion or compulsion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Miranda Fuel Co.
See also Alvado v. General Motors Corp., 303 F.2d 718 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962). ****** “These authorities establish the principle that a union does not violate Section 8(b) (2) unless the discrimination which the union seeks would constitute a violation of Section 8(a) (3) if the employer acted without union suggestion or compulsion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Independent
(2×)
See also Alvado v. General Motors Corp., 303 F.2d 718 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 925 , 83 S.Ct. 293 , 9 L.Ed.2d 233 (1962).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alvado
v.
General Motors Corp.
v.
General Motors Corp.
No. 467.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1962.
Harry Montgomery Ijeet, Sidney S. Berman, Frank Montgomery, Sheldon E. Bernstein, Morton Lijtin and Joseph M. Stone for petitioners., Aloysius F. Power and George A. Brooks for respondent.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
Motion to defer consideration of petition for certiorari and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.