Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Jones, 371 U.S. 952 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Jones, 371 U.S. 952 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
61 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Intel Corp. v. Amberwave Systems Corp. (ded, 2005-11-29)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Intel Corp. v. Amberwave Systems Corp.
D. Del. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 483 (“If there is no issued patent, ‘no controversy under the patent laws exists, upon which [the accused infringer] can bring an action for declaratory judgment.’ ”) (quoting Muskegon Piston Ring Co. v. Olsen, 307 F.2d 85, 89 (6th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 952 , 83 S.Ct. 508 , 9 L.Ed.2d 500 (1963)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. v. Norton Company
Fed. Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1238 (1990); see also Muskegon Piston Ring Co. v. Olsen, 307 F.2d 85, 89 (6th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 952 , 83 S.Ct. 508 , 9 L.Ed.2d 500 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sears, Roebuck & Co.
v.
Jones
No. 596.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1963.
371 U.S. 952
Cedric W. Porter and Philip H. Sheridan for petitioners., Herbert J. Jacobi, Samuel L. Davidson and Robert B. Jacobi for respondents.
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.