green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Koefoot v. American College of Surgeons
See generally, Rosee v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago, 311 F.2d 524 (7th Cir.1963), cert. den., 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krome v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
See Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc., 313 F.2d 472, 475-76 (3d Cir.) (action under Section 35(d)), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 , (1963); Monheit v. Carter, 376 F.Supp. 334, 340 (S.D.N.Y.1974) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Greater Iowa Corporation v. Frank McLendon
See, Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc., 313 F.2d 472, 476 , cert. denied 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (3 Cir. 1963); Brown v. Bullock, 294 F.2d 415 (2 Cir. 1961); II Loss, Securities Regulation (1962 Supp.), pp. 14-15.
cited
Cited "see"
Covey Oil Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
See Lee v. Western Wool Processors, Inc., 10 Cir., 313 F.2d 13, 15 , certiorari denied 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1695 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 . . 369 U.S. 121 , 126, 82 S.Ct. 654, 657 . . .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
SecuraComm Consulting, Inc. v. Securacom Inc.
McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks § 24:6 (4th Ed.1997); see also Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc. 313 F.2d 472 (3d Cir.) cert. denied, 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fisher v. Louis Marx & Co. of W. Va., Inc.
Compare Flexitized, Inc. v. National Flexitized Corp., 335 F.2d 774, 780 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 913 , 85 S.Ct. 899 , 13 L.Ed.2d 799 (1965), and Taussig v. Wellington Fund, Inc., 313 F.2d 472 , 474 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 806 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1963) with Bliss v. Gotham Industries, Inc., 316 F.2d 848, 854 (9th Cir. 1963), and Landstrom v. Thorpe, 189 F.2d 46, 52 , 26 A.L.R.2d 1170 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 342 U.S. 819 , 72 S.Ct. 37 , 96 L.Ed. 620 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Benson
v.
California
v.
California
No. 686.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1963.
Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and William B. McKesson for respondent.
Published
District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.