Gen. Elec. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Co., 374 U.S. 809 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Gen. Elec. Co. v. Pub. Serv. Co., 374 U.S. 809 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
116 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 36 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Thomas N. Shiomos (ca3, 1988-12-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Thomas N. Shiomos
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Holovachka, 314 F.2d 345, 351-53 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1695 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
2d Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See note 10 supra. 12 The First Circuit has noted "the settled principle that a defendant's testimony to the effect that he did not commit the crime cannot raise an issue of entrapment." Sylvia v. United States, 312 F.2d 145, 147 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1694 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Olga Valencia and William Suarez Valencia
2d Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See note 10 supra. 12 The First Circuit has noted "the settled principle that a defendant's testimony to the effect that he did not commit the crime cannot raise an issue of entrapment." Sylvia v. United States, 312 F.2d 145, 147 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1694 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1963).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Fischman v. Fischman
E.D. Pa. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Public Service Co. v. General Electric Co., 315 F.2d 306 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1695 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Harry R. Haldeman, United States of America v. John D. Ehrlichman, United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, United States of America v. Harry R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman, Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.united States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Holovachka, 314 F.2d 345, 351-352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 (1963); United States v. Isaacs, 364 F.Supp. 895, 899-900 (N.D.Ill.1972), conviction affirmed, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 3183 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Haldeman
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Holovachka, 314 F.2d 345, 351-352 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 (1963); United States v. Isaacs, 364 F.Supp. 895, 899-900 (N.D.Ill.1972), conviction affirmed, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 976 , 94 S.Ct. 3183 , 41 L.Ed.2d 1146 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Walter Swiderski and Maritza De Los Santos
2d Cir. · 1976 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Sylvia v. United States, 312 F.2d 145, 147 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1694 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1963); United States v. Watson, 489 F.2d 504, 507 (3 Cir. 1973); McCarty v. United States, 379 F.2d 285 (5 Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 929 , 88 S.Ct. 291 , 19 L.Ed.2d 281 (1967); United States v. Johnston, 426 F.2d 112, 114 (7 Cir. 1970); and Ortiz v. United States, 358 F.2d 107, 108-09 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 861 , 87 S.Ct. 114 , 17 L.Ed.2d 88 (1966), with Hansford v. United States, supra; Crisp v. United States, 262 F.2d 68, 70 (4 Cir. 1958); and Scriber v. Un…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Willie McCarty Jr. v. United States
5th Cir. · 1967 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare those cases supporting the government’s position, Sylvia v. United States, 1 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 145 , cert. den. 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1694 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1032 ; United States v. Di Donna, 2 Cir., 1960, 276 F.2d 956 ; United States v. Carter, 7 Cir., 1963, 326 F.2d 351 ; Ortiz v. United States, 9 Cir., 1966, 358 F.2d 107 , with those contra, Hansford v. United States, D.C.Cir., 1962 (en banc), 303 F.2d 219 ; United States v. Bishop, 2 Cir., 1966, 367 F.2d 806 ; Crisp v. United States, 4 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 68 ; Scriber v. United States, 6 Cir., 1925, 4 F.2d 97 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Albert B. Brooke v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Sylvia v. United States, 312 F.2d 145 , 147 n. 1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1694 , 10 D.Ed.2d 1032 (1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." William J. Bauers, Jr. v. Herbert T. Heisel, Jr (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1966 · signal: see also · confidence low
The failure of the Seventh Circuit to remand to the district court the cause against the corporation counsel substantiates this position. 291 F.2d 706 (1961); see also Phillips v. Nash, 311 F.2d 513 (C.A.7, 1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1700 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1033 (1963). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States Ex Rel. Holloway v. Reincke
D. Conn. · 1964 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Hall v. Warden, 313 F.2d 483 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1963); United States ex rel.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States ex rel. Staples v. Pate
N.D. Ill. · 1963 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Hall v. Warden, 313 F.2d 483 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, Pep-persack v. Hall, 374 U.S. 809 , 83 S.Ct. 1693 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1963); Channel v. United States, 285 F.2d 217 (9th Cir. 1960); Judd v. United States, 89 U.S. App.D.C. 64, 190 F.2d 649 (1951).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
General Electric Co.
v.
Public Service Co. of New Mexico
No. 1041.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 1963.
374 U.S. 809
John F. Shafroth, Winston S. Howard, James T. Paulantis, William A. Sloan, Benjamin F, Stapleton, Luis D. Rovira, Josiah G. Holland, William C. McClearn, Joseph G. Hodges, Richard M. Davis, Ross L. Malone and Richard T. Conway for petitioners.
Consideration, Took.
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.