green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Philip Morris, Inc. v. Emerson
(2×)
See Halliburton Co. v. Norton Drilling Co., 302 F.2d 431, 437 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 (1963); Guarnieri v. Kewanee-Ross Corp., 270 F.2d 575, 579-80 (2d Cir. 1959); Lattea, Adm’r., 9 Ohio App. 3d at 122, 458 N.E.2d at 873 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lyle S. Woodcock v. R. W. Amaral
See United States v. Leonard, 161 U.S.App.D.C. 36 , 494 F.2d 955, 970 (1974), citing Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 645-46 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Prieur
See Gorin v. United States, 1st Cir., 313 F.2d 641 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; United States v. Gassaway, 5th Cir., 456 F.2d 624 (1972); United States v. Jackson, 5th Cir., 448 F.2d 539 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Irie E. Leonard, United States of America v. James L. Sarvis
(2×)
See Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 645-646 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See Gorin v. United States, 1st Cir., 313 F.2d 641 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; United States v. Gassaway, 5th Cir., 456 F.2d 624 (1972); United States v. Jackson, 5th Cir., 448 F.2d 539 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry P. Hutul, Robert Sacks, Herbert Basan, Nancy Mitchell, and Vito Lombardi
See United States v. Wapnick, 198 F.Supp. 359 (D.C.E.D.N.Y.1961), aff’d. per curiam, 315 F.2d 96 , cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; Rios v. United States, 256 F.2d 173 (9th Cir. 1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wapnick v. United States
See United States v. Wapnick, 315 F.2d 96 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1868 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), rehearing denied, 375 U.S. 871 , 84 S.Ct. 30 , 11 L.Ed.2d 100 (1963) and 383 U.S. 923 , 86 S.Ct. 879 , 15 L.Ed.2d 680 (1966); Wapnick v. United States, 355 F.2d 136 (2d Cir. 1966); Wapnick v. Chappell, 376 F.2d 853 (2d Cir. 1967); Wapnick v. United States, 406 F.2d 741 (2d Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Chester Naquin, G & M Boats, Inc. v. Tidelands Marine Service, Inc., and Plaisance Dragline & Dredging Company, Inc.
See the case of Halliburton Company v. Norton Drilling Company, 302 F.2d 431 (5 Cir., 1962), *915 reh. den. 313 F.2d 380 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), which is similar factually on the indemnity question.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Vale
See, Gorin v. United States, 1 Cir., 313 F.2d 641 , cert, denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed. 2d 1052 ; United States v. Sopher, 362 F.2d 523 , cert, denied, 385 U.S. 928 , 87 S.Ct. 286 , 17 L.Ed.2d 210 ; United States v. Van Allen, D.C., 28 F.R.D. 329 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Pugliese, A/K/A \Feety
See Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 654 (1 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963); Model Penal Code § 2.13(2) (Prop.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Allen
See also Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641,652 (1st Cir. 1963), cert, denied, 374 U.S. 829 (1963) (appellate court examined transcription of tape recordings and concluded that “inaudible parts are [not] so substantial as to make the rest more misleading than helpful”); United States v. Bell, supra (trial judge properly admitted partially inaudible tape recordings, giving opponent opportunity to offer his version of the inaudible portions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.
See, e. g., Halliburton Company v. Norton Drilling Company, 5th Cir. 1962, 302 F.2d 431 , reh. denied 1963, 313 F.2d 380 , cert. denied 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; American President Lines, Ltd. v. Marine Terminals Corporation, 9th Cir. 1956, 234 F.2d 753 , cert. denied 352 U.S. 926 , 77 S.Ct. 222 , 1 L.Ed.2d 161 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.
See, e. g., Halliburton Company v. Norton Drilling Company, 5th Cir. 1962, 302 F.2d 431 , reh. denied 1963, 313 F.2d 380 , cert, denied 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 ; American President Lines, Ltd. v. Marine Terminals Corporation, 9th Cir. 1956, 234 F.2d 753 , cert, denied 352 U.S. 926 , 77 S.Ct. 222 , 1 L.Ed.2d 161 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harvin v. United States
Compare with Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), and Fredrick v. United States, 163 F.2d 536 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 775 , 68 S.Ct. 87 , 92 L.Ed. 360 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Conester Gore, United States of America v. Haywood Liles
Compare Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 647 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), with Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203 , 338 F.2d 543, 544 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Gillette
See also, Gorin v. United States, 313 F.2d 641, 647 (1st Cir.), cert. denied 374 U.S. 829 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1052 (1963), not cited by appellant, which discusses the proper conduct of voir dire, holding that the refusal to ask particular questions such as those in issue here, including refusal to ask whether the jurors would presume guilt from the accusation, was not an abuse of discretion.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wapnick
v.
United States and LaFazia v. United States
v.
United States and LaFazia v. United States
No. 1044; No. 1074.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Herbert S. Siegal for petitioner in No. 1044. Joseph Brill and Jacob W. Friedman for petitioners in No. 1074. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rgsenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Published
C.' A. 2d Cir. .Certiorari denied.