Sikes v. Rutland, 374 U.S. 830 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Sikes v. Rutland, 374 U.S. 830 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
261 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 65 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: M'Otto Enterprises, Inc. v. Redsand, Inc. (wawd, 1993-07-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" M'Otto Enterprises, Inc. v. Redsand, Inc.
W.D. Wash. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 154 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963).
cited Cited "see" Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Hibernia Bank
N.D. Cal. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); see also E.
discussed Cited "see" Shelby County Jail Inmates v. Richard W. Westlake, Individually and as Sheriff of Shelby County
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Caputo v. U.S. Lines Company, 311 F.2d 413, 416 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 833 , 83 S.Ct. 1871 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1963); see also Lincoln v. Board of Regents of University System, 697 F.2d 928, 934 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 826 , 104 S.Ct. 97 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" Sicilia Di R. Biebow & Co. v. Ronald C. Cox and Sales U.S.A., Inc.
5th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 161 (9th Cir.) (whole range of decisions in trademark infringement field illustrates conclusion “that an infringer seldom makes a Chinese copy of another’s trademark, package or label”), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963). *432 Another consideration is the “previous contractual or business relations between the parties.” Falcon Rice, 725 F.2d at 345 n. 9 (quoting Sun-Fun, 656 F.2d at 189 ). “[T]his factor will usually be considered as a subcategory of ‘intent.’ ” Id.
discussed Cited "see" The Coca-Cola Company, a Corporation v. Overland, Inc., Doing Business as Topaz Lodge and Casino, and R.H. Hobson
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Coca-Cola Co. v. Dorris, 311 F.Supp. at 290 ; see Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 157-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Rudner, 246 F.2d 826, 829 (9th Cir.1957).
cited Cited "see" Communications Workers v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
S.D. Tex. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Procter and Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory v. Procter and Gamble Manufacturing Co., 312 F.2d 181, 188 (2nd Cir. 1902), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1872 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1969).
cited Cited "see" Paul Smith, an Individual v. Edward L. Montoro and Film Ventures International Inc.
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); F.E.L.
discussed Cited "see" Gallo Wine Sales of New Jersey, Inc. v. Wholesale Wine Salesmen's Union, Local 18
S.D.N.Y. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
The question of “whether or not the company was bound to arbitrate, as well as what issues it must arbitrate, is a matter to be determined by the Court on the basis of the contract entered into by the parties.” Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co., 370 U.S. 238, 241 , 82 S.Ct. 1318, 1320 , 8 L.Ed.2d 462 (1962); see Proctor & Gamble Independent Union v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co., 312 F.2d 181, 184 (2d Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1872 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963).
discussed Cited "see" Jeff Jacobs v. The Board of School Commissioners, Etc. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Till and Westcott, supra, and Rutland v. Sikes, 203 F.Supp. 276 (E.D.S.C., 1962), aff'd on other grounds, 311 F.2d 538 (4 Cir.), cert. denied 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1871 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 . 8 2.
cited Cited "see" Mortellito v. Nina of California, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blinded Veterans Association v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149 (9th Cir.) ("Black & White” scotch whiskey), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); Mustang Motels, Inc. v. Patel, 226 U.S.P.Q. 526 (C.D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Blinded Veterans Ass'n v. Blinded American Veterans Foundation
D.C. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149 (9th Cir.) ("Black & White" scotch whiskey), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); Mustang Motels, Inc. v. Patel, 226 U.S.P.Q. 526 (C.D.Cal.1985) ("Mustang” motels); see generally McCarthy § 11:4 at 440-41 (providing examples of arbitrary terms). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. Beamish & Crawford Limited
Fed. Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 159-60 , 136 USPQ 508 , 518 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 (1963) (finding that beer and Scotch whiskey, which are both alcoholic beverages, are "so related as to fall within the mischief which equity should prevent").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Grey v. Campbell Soup Co.
C.D. Cal. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 151-53 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); National Lead Co. v. Wolfe, 223 F.2d 195, 197-200 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 883 , 76 S.Ct. 135 , 100 L.Ed. 778 (1955).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jellibeans, Incorporated, a Georgia Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Skating Clubs of Georgia, Inc., a Georgia Corporation, Cross-Appellee
11th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
This proposition is adhered to by a number of the circuit courts; see, e.g., Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 159 (9th Cir.1963) cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963) (ultimate issue of likelihood of confusion is a question of law); Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Johnson, 219 F.2d 590, 591 (3rd Cir.1955); Millworth Converting Corp. v. Slifka, 276 F.2d 443, 445-46 (2nd Cir.1960); McCormick & Co. v. B.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Visa International Service Ass'n v. Visa Hotel Group, Inc.
D. Nev. · 1983 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149, 157-158 (9th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830 , 83 S.Ct. 1870 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sikes
v.
Rutland, Administrator
No. 1073.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
374 U.S. 830
A. Frank Lever, Jr. for petitioners. Henry Hammier for- respondent.
Published

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.