In re Grand Jury Investigation of Violations of 18 U. S. C. § 1621, 375 U.S. 802 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Grand Jury Investigation of Violations of 18 U. S. C. § 1621, 375 U.S. 802 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the supreme court scarcely intended that the important policy pronouncements in cobbledick and di bella could be side-stepped by baptizing ... a motion to suppress as one for an injunction restraining the use of evidence and mandating its return....”
27 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 14 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Allen M. Dorfman, (Two Cases). Appeal of David Dorfman Appeal of William E. Webbe. United States of America v. Allen M. Dorfman (ca7, 1982-09-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Allen M. Dorfman, (Two Cases). Appeal of David Dorfman Appeal of William E. Webbe. United States of America v. Allen M. Dorfman
7th Cir. · 1982 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the supreme court scarcely intended that the important policy pronouncements in cobbledick and di bella could be side-stepped by baptizing ... a motion to suppress as one for an injunction restraining the use of evidence and mandating its return....
cited Cited "see" James Miller v. United States
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Grand Jury Investigation, 318 F.2d 533, 536 (2 Cir.), petition for certiorari dismissed, 375 U.S. 802 , 84 S.Ct. 25 , 11 L.Ed.2d 37 (1963).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Armco Steel Corp.
W.D. Mo. · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, In the Matter of the Grand Jury Investigation (General Motors), 32 F.R.D. 175, 180 (S.D.N.Y.1963), appeal dismissed 318 F.2d 533 (2d Cir. 1963), and 375 U.S. 802 , 84 S.Ct. 25 , 11 L.Ed.2d 37 (1963). 19 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Christian v. United States
D.C. · 1978 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. DiGilio, 538 F.2d 972, 985 (3d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 733 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977), with In re Grand Jury Investigation (General Motors Corp.), 32 F.R.D. 175, 185 (S.D.N.Y.), appeal dismissed, 318 F.2d 533 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 375 U.S. 802 , 84 S.Ct. 25 , 11 L.Ed.2d 37 (1963). 118 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Director of Internal Revenue
E.D. Pa. · 1976 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also In re Grand Jury Investigation (General Motors Corp.), 32 F.R.D. 175, 181 (S.D.N.Y.), app. dismissed, 318 F.2d 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 802 , 84 S.Ct. 25 , 11 L.Ed.2d 37 (1963) (motion for injunction or protective order, while not appealable because equivalent to motion to quash, is within district court’s supervisory jurisdiction). 5 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Grand Jury Investigation of Violations of 18 U. S. C. § 1621 (General Motors Corp.) and General Motors Corp.
v.
Edelstein, U. S. District Judge
No. 316; No. 431.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1963.
375 U.S. 802
Bruce Bromley, Aloysius F. Power, Robert A. Nitschke and John W. Barnurn for General Motors Corp. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States et al.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in No. 316, and motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari and/or mandamus in No. 431, Misc., dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.

Reported below: 318 F. 2d 533, 32 F. R. D. 175.