green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Steel Hill Development, Inc. v. Town of Sanbornton
See International Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 315 F.2d 449, 455 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 56 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963); Atwood v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 34 F.2d 18, 23 (1st Cir. 1929), cert. denied 280 U.S. 600 , 50 S.Ct. 81 , 74 L.Ed. 646 ; Lasasso v. Lasasso, 1 N.J. 324 , 63 A.2d 526 (1949); Restatement, Judgments, § 54, comment d at 214-15 (1942).
discussed
Cited "see"
Callman Gottesman, Maria Mattiello, and Paul J. Peyser v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company,defendants-Appellees
See International Shoe Machine Corp. v. United *963 Shoe Machinery Corp., 315 F.2d 449 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 56 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963); Orbo Theatre Corp. v. Loew’s Inc., 156 F.Supp. 770, 777 (D.D.C.1957), aff’d per curiam, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 262 , 261 F.2d 380 (D.C.Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 943 , 79 S.Ct. 725 , 3 L.Ed.2d 677 (1959); cf. Webster Rosewood Corp. v. Schine Chain Theatres, Inc., 263 F.2d 533 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 360 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 1296 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1261 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul O. Johnson v. United States
See, Imperial Meat Company v. United States, 316 F.2d 435 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 57 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963); United States v. United States Cartridge Co., 95 F.Supp. 384, 393 (E.D.Mo.1950), aff’d, 198 F.2d 456 (8th Cir. 1952), cert. denied, 345 U.S. 910 , 73 S.Ct. 645 , 97 L.Ed. 1345 (1953).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Switchmen's Union of North America v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, the Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company v. Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, (Two Cases)
Compare Pullman Co. v. Order of Railway Conductors, 316 F.2d 556 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 57 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963) 32 The District Opinion is reported: Akron & B.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad
Compare Pullman Co. v. Order of Railway Conductors, 316 E.2d 556 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 57 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
HML Corp. v. General Foods Corp.
In Re United Cigar Stores Co., 7 F.2d 673, 675 (2 Cir. 1934), cert. denied, Consolidated Dairy Products Co. v. Irving Trust Co., 293 U.S. 617 , 55 S.Ct. 210 , 79 L.Ed. 706 (1934); accord, Oregon Plywood Sales Corp. v. Sutherlin Plywood Corp., 246 F.2d 466, 469, 470 (9 Cir. 1957) ; see Du Boff v. Matam Corp., 272 App.Div. 502 , 71 N.Y.S.2d 134 (1st Dept. 1947); see also Rubinger v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp., 193 F.Supp. 711, 718 (S.D.N.Y.1961) aff’d. 310 F.2d 552 (2 Cir. 1962) cert. denied 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 57 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Shoe Machine Corp.
v.
United Shoe Machinery Corp.
v.
United Shoe Machinery Corp.
No. 191.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
Breck P. McAllister for petitioner. Ralph M. Carson and Robert Proctor for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.