green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bender Shipbuilding & Repair Co. v. Morgan (In Re Morgan)
(2×)
Accord, In re Muskegon Motor Specialties Co., 313 F.2d 841 (6th Cir.1963), cert. den., 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 832 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 .
cited
Cited "see"
Loe v. United States
See Coles v. Peyton, supra, 389 F.2d at 226 , Jones v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 347, 353 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 42 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr., (Decoster Iii)
(2×)
See Jones v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 347, 353 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 42 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haskins v. Point Towing Co.
See Daniels v. Florida Power & Light Company, 317 F.2d 41 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 78 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963). 13 After a careful consideration of plaintiff's contention that the separate corporate entity of Bulk Towing, Inc. should be disregarded or that it should be treated as the agent of Point Towing Co., we have concluded that the record 7 requires affirmance of the District Court's conclusion that there has been no showing justifying the disregard of the separate corporate entities of Point Towing Co., Bulk Towing, Inc., and O-Kan Harbor, Inc. in this case.
cited
Cited "see"
Haskins v. Point Towing Co.
See Daniels v. Florida Power & Light Company, 317 F.2d 41 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 78 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Louis McCloud v. Alfred T. Rundle, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See cases cited in Jones v. Cunningham, 313 F.2d 347 , 351 n. 13 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 42 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bohack Corp. v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 807, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See also In re Muskegon Motor Specialities Co., 313 F.2d 841 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 51 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Benevento v. United States
Compare Panama Canal Co. v. Anderson, 312 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 832 , 84 S.Ct. 43 , 11 L.Ed.2d 63 (1963).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Benevento v. United States
Compare Panama Canal Co. v. Anderson, 312 F.2d 98 (5th Cir.1963), ce rt. denied, 375 U.S. 832 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wade v. Carter, Jr. v. Panama Canal Company
Compare § 5544 “(i) involves the performance of work while traveling” with 29 C.F.R. “§ 785.41 Work performed while traveling.” Compare “(ii) is incident to travel that involves the performance of work while traveling” with “§ 785.38 Travel that is all in the day’s work.” Compare “(iv) results from an event which could not be scheduled or controlled administratively” with “§ 785.36 Home to work in emergency situations” and “§ 785.37 Home to work on special one-day assignment in another city” and “§ 785.39 Travel away from home community.” Section 5544’…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Daniels
v.
Florida Power & Light Co.
v.
Florida Power & Light Co.
No. 341.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
Jacob Rassner for petitioners. Samuel J. Powers, Jr. for respondent.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.