Lamar v. Bookwalter, 376 U.S. 969 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Lamar v. Bookwalter, 376 U.S. 969 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “[I]f there is present in [an organization’s] operations a single noncharitable purpose substantial in nature, though it may have other truly and important charitable purposes, it is not entitled to be exempt.”
56 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Freedom Church of Revelation v. United States (dcd, 1984-04-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Freedom Church of Revelation v. United States
D.D.C. · 1984 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
f there is present in operations a single noncharitable purpose substantial in nature, though it may have other truly and important charitable purposes, it is not entitled to be exempt.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Burns v. Police Bd. of City of Chicago
Ill. App. Ct. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 1288 , 56 S. Ct. 906 ; see also Des Plaines Currency Exchange, Inc. v. Knight (1963), 29 Ill. 2d 244, 247-48 , 194 N.E.2d 89 , cert, denied (1964), 376 U.S. 969 , 12 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lamar
v.
Bookwalter, District Director of Internal Revenue
No. 852.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 6, 1964.
376 U.S. 969
James J. Waters for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Ober-dorfer, Robert N. Anderson and Benjamin M. Parker for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.