LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U.S. 998 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
LaVallee v. Durocher, 377 U.S. 998 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
85 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 34 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mendes v. Johnson (dc, 1978-06-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Mendes v. Johnson (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
D.C. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Annot., 10 A.L.R.3d 1371 , 1382-84 (1966). [19] See, e. g., United States v. LaVallee, 330 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 998 , 84 S.Ct. 1921 , 12 L.Ed.2d 1048 (1964). [20] See, e. g., Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc., 152 U.S.App.D.C. 86 , 469 F.2d 97 (1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 939 , 93 S.Ct. 2774 , 37 L.Ed.2d 399 (1973).
cited Cited "see" Manning v. State
Md. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. LaVallee (2d Cir.), 330 F. 2d 303 , cert. den. 377 U. S. 998 , 12 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LaVallee, Warden
v.
Durocher
No. 1109.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
377 U.S. 998
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Ronald J. Offenkrantz and Barry Mahoney, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners., Leon B. Polsky for respondents.
Harlan.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Dissent

Mr. Justice Harlan,

dissenting.

I believe that the issue in this case has an importance which justifies departure from my usual practice of not noting a dissent to a denial of certiorari with which I do not agree. The issue is whether this Court’s holding in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335, is required to be given retroactive effect. That question-, which is of continuing concern in the administration of criminal justice in a substantial number of States, deserves plenary consideration by this Court, which it has not yet had. See my dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U. S. 2, 3.

I would grant certiorari and set the case for argument.