green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
“it is improper to utilize a grand jury for the sole or dominating purpose of preparing an already pending indictment for trial.”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
George T. C. Lollar v. United States
(2×)
But cf. United States v. Dardi, 2 Cir., 330 F.2d 316, 335 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Furrow
it is improper to utilize a grand jury for the sole or dominating purpose of preparing an already pending indictment for trial.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Santoro
t is not a legitimate function of the grand jury to serve as a substitute for pretrial discovery.
cited
Cited "see"
In re Eight Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon John Doe, Esq. Richard Roe, Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 51 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
examined
Cited "see"
Doubleday & Co., Inc. v. Rogers
(4×)
Accord, Loftsgaarden v. Reiling, 267 Minn. 181 , 126 N.W.2d 154 (1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 31 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); Toomey v. Farley, 2 N.Y.2d 71 , 156 N.Y.S.2d 840 , 138 N.E.2d 221 (1956); Kent v. City of Buffalo, 61 Misc.2d 142 , 304 N.Y.S.2d 949 (Sup.Ct.Erie County 1969), rev’d on other grounds, 29 N.Y.2d 818 , 327 N.Y.S.2d 653 , 277 N.E.2d 669 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Field v. Omaha Standard, Inc.
See Wirtz v. International Harvester Co., 331 F.2d 462, 465 (5th Cir.1964), cert. den., 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David Guillette and Robert Joost
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lawrence Daniel Caldwell, A/K/A Thomas E. Morgan, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Eros A. Timm, (Two Cases)
(2×)
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 332-333 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Crosby, 294 F.2d 928, 948-950 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 984 , 82 S.Ct. 599 , 7 L.Ed.2d 523 (1962).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Edwards, Max Jakob, John J. Lombardozzi and Milton Parness
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 330 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Kahaner, supra, 317 F.2d at 476 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Bentvena, William Struzzieri and Samuel Monastersky
See United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy B. Kelly, Cecil v. Hagen and Milton J. Shuck
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Dardi, 2 Cir., 1964, 330 F.2d 316, 330, 332 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 ; United States v. Crosby, 2 Cir., 1961, 294 F.2d 928, 943-944 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Salt Lake City v. Grotepas
Brinson v. Florida, 273 F.Supp. 840, 846-47 (S.D.Fla.1967); see also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 335 (2d Cir.) (holding that exercise of right to counsel must be subject to necessities of sound judicial administration), cer t. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 51, 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); accord Creighton v. North Carolina, 257 F.Supp. 806, 809 (E.D.N.C.1966) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stacey v. Charles J. Rogers, Inc.
See, e.g., Wirtz v. International Harvester Co., 331 F.2d 462, 466 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stacey v. Charles Rogers, Inc.
See, e.g., Wirtz v. International Harvester Co., 331 F.2d 462, 466 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Penfield v. Venuti
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.) (“[w]hile an arrest alone is not normally admissible to impair the credibility of a witness, the fact that it may embitter him so as to motivate him to testify as he has may be relevant”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel., L.C.J. v. VanArtsdale
See, e. g., United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed. 50 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See, e. g., United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed. 50 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Moran Doss
(2×)
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 336 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964), and Application of Iaconi, 120 F.Supp. 589, 591 (D.Mass.1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Crotty Brothers Dallas, Inc.
See also Wirtz v. International Harvester Company, 331 F.2d 462, 465 (5th Cir. 1964), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 36 ,. 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964) ; Mitchell v. City Ice Company, Inc., 273 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1960). 30 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Mingoia and Herbert Richman
See, e. g., United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316, 323-333 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Crosby, 294 F.2d 928, 948-950 (2d Cir. 1961), cert. denied, sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Castellana
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817 , 99 A.L.R.2d 478 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 361 U.S. 863 , 80 S.Ct. 119 , 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter Castellana
See also United States v. Dardi, 330 F.2d 316 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 845 , 85 S.Ct. 50 , 13 L.Ed.2d 50 (1964); United States v. Agueci, 310 F.2d 817 , 99 A.L.R.2d 478 (2 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 959 , 83 S.Ct. 1013 , 10 L.Ed.2d 11 (1963); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 361 U.S. 863 , 80 S.Ct. 119 , 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959). 23 A. Although citing no explicit statutory or case authority to support their position, Joseph Weinberg and David Newman advance the technical claim that their admissions were privileged under Section 7, sub. a(10) of the Ba…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reiling
v.
Loftsgaarden
v.
Loftsgaarden
No. 66.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
Robert A. Gearin for petitioner. Mortimer B. Miley for respondent.
Black, Granted, Should.
Published
Citer courts: C.D. California (1) · E.D. New York (1)
Supreme Court of Minnesota. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black is of. the opinion that certiorari should be granted.