green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Martha POE, Appellant, v. JOHN DEERE COMPANY, Appellee
But see Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 , 222 n. 63 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 147 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1964); Farmer v. Arabian American Oil Co., 324 F.2d 359 (2d Cir.1963), rev’d on other grounds, 379 U.S. 227 , 85 S.Ct. 411 , 13 L.Ed.2d 248 (1964).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Miller v. Juarez Cartel
we hold that the only costs recoverable by a successful plaintiff in a private antitrust suit are those which are normally allowable under 28 u.s.c. 1920 and rule 54(d), and that such costs do not include accounting fees.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Miller v. Juarez Cartel
we hold that the only costs recoverable by a successful plaintiff in a private antitrust suit are those which are normally allowable under 28 u.s.c. 1920 and rule 54(d), and that such costs do not include accounting fees.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert's Waikiki U-Drive, Inc. v. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc.
pjlaintiff must show that, whether or not then known to the conspirators, plaintiff's affected operation was actually in the area which it could reasonably be foreseen would be affected by the conspiracy
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Greene
See Bins v. United States, 331 F.2d 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brett C. Kimberlin
See United States v. Bins, 331 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir.1964) (dismissing a duplicitous indictment because the jury may not have agreed unanimously that defendant committed at least one of the offenses charged in the indictment), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 .
cited
Cited "see"
Rosario v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tomas Rosario, Ovidio Vega and Ray Cabel, Cross-Appellants v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Cross-Appellee, and Abe Dolgen, Individually and as Manager of Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Tomas Rosario, Ovidio Vega and Ray Cabel, Cross-Appellants v. Amalgamated Ladies' Garment Cutters' Union, Local 10, I.L.G.W.U., Cross-Appellee, and International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964). 14 The general principles governing a fee award to a party who has prevailed on some claims but been unsuccessful on others were recently set forth by the Supreme Court in Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Exhibitors' Service, Inc. v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964), the only Ninth Circuit case to deal with expert fees as costs, held that accounting fees are not recoverable.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Edward Glanton
See Bins v. United States, 331 F.2d 390, 392-93 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Costa Lines, Inc.
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 215 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nicholas J. Mangieri, Jr.
See Bins v. United States, 331 F.2d 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 147 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1964), where the court found that the submission of two false documents concerning a single Federal Housing Administration loan constituted two offenses under 18 U.S.C. § 1010 . 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Johnny L. Spain v. Louis Mountanos, and Kenneth Cory, Controller, of the State of California
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Regina
See United States v. South Fla. Asphalt Co., 329 F.2d 860, 865 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); United States v. American Oil Co., 286 F.Supp. 742, 746-47 (D.N.J.1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross
Accord, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Hedrick Stanley
See Bins v. United States, 331 F.2d 390 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Calzada
See United States v. South Florida Asphalt Co., 329 F.2d 860 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964) 4 Apparently seven of the illegal aliens escaped either before or during the arrest in Lockport, Illinois 5 The parties engaged in a substantial dispute over the defendants' conduct in relation to one of the aliens who was believed to have left the country but who was subsequently located.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Calzada
See United States v. South Florida Asphalt Co., 329 F.2d 860 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed,2d 87 (1964). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Benedetto
(2×)
See United States v. Beno, 324 F.2d 582 (2d Cir. 1963), aff'd after remand, 333 F.2d 669 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 147 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists
See Local 12404, District 50, UMW v. Martin Marietta Corp., 328 F.2d 945 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 147 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1965). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Adrian Ambrose, Alias Lilly Ambrose
See United States v. Beno, 324 F.2d 582, 588-589 (2d Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 147 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1963); *749 IIIA.
discussed
Cited "see"
Marion Francis Fountain and Roosevelt Tremble v. United States of America, Eugene J. Marshall v. United States
See United States v. Beno, 333 F.2d 669 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 147 , 13 L.Ed.2d 86 (1964); Todisco v. United States, 298 F.2d 208 (9th Cir., 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 989 , 82 S.Ct. 602 , 7 L.Ed.2d 527 (1962). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Perryton Wholesale, Inc., a Corporation v. Pioneer Distributing Company of Kansas, Inc., a Corporation
See Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 9 Cir., 328 F.2d 190, 221 , certiorari denied 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 . 11 . 15 U.S.C. § 14 . 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick v. City of Portland
Photocopying Costs Photocopying costs are recoverable to the extent that the copies were “necessarily obtained for use in the case.” 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (4); see also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Haagen-Dazs Company, Inc. Pillsbury Company v. Double Rainbow Gourmet Ice Creams, Inc. Two Count Company, Inc.
Moreover, the Local Rules of the Northern District of California (“Local Rules”) allow, as taxable costs, “[t]he cost of reproducing documents obtained [in discovery] and used for any purpose in the case.... ” Local Rules App. A, ¶ V(B); see also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 224 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964) (upholding award of photocopying costs).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivera v. City of Riverside
See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964). 9 In Kerr, this court listed twelve factors for the district court to consider in setting attorney's fees awards. 4 The record must "demonstrate that the district court considered the factors established by Kerr." Kessler v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc., 639 F.2d 498, 500 (9th Cir. 1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivera v. City of Riverside
See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ramos v. Lamm
See also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190, 221 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964), which lists nine criteria that trial courts should consider in determining reasonable antitrust attorney fee awards.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dowdell v. City of Apopka, Fla.
See, e. g., Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); Hugney v. Consolidation Coal Co., 59 F.R.D. 258 (D.Pa.1973); Sperry Rand Corp. v. A-T-O, Inc., 58 F.R.D. 132 (D.Va.1973). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mendel Schwimmer D/B/A Supersonic Electronics Co. v. Sony Corporation of America and Sony Corporation
Contreras v. Grower Shipper Assn. of Central California, 1971 Trade Cas. ¶73,592 (N.D.Cal.1971), aff’d per curiam, 484 F.2d 1346 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 932 , 94 S.Ct. 1445 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); see also Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 , 220 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964), discussing, Karseal Corp. v. Richfield Oil Corp., 221 F.2d 358, 362 (9th Cir. 1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Starks, in No. 74-1966 Appeal of Alonzo Robinson, in No. 74-1947. Appeal of Donald Everett Abney, in No. 74-1967
See, e.g., Bins v. Unitea States, 331 F.2d 390, 393 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 149 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 (1964); United States v. Goodman, 285 F.2d 378, 380 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 366 U.S. 930 , 81 S.Ct. 1651 , 6 L.Ed.2d 389 (1961). 9 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kurt Strauss v. Douglas Aircraft Co.
See also Twentieth Century Fox v. Goldwyn, 328 F.2d 190 , 214-215 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied 379 U.S. 880 , 85 S.Ct. 143 , 13 L.Ed.2d 87 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beno
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 328.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 19, 1964.
W. Paul Flynn, Bernard P. Kopkind and Charles L. Flynn for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P: Cooper for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: D. North Dakota (2) · D. Hawaii (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.