green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Football League v. National Football League
See Buckhead Theatre Co. v. Atlanta Enters., Inc., 327 F.2d 365, 368-69 (5th Cir.) (evidence of prior antitrust judgment irrelevant unless plaintiff introduced evidence that practices complained of in prior case "had an injurious effect upon the plaintiff"), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964); Bray v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 392 F.Supp. 851, 866 (prior antitrust judgment admitted where underlying conduct was same as that alleged in main case) (citing FTC v. Cement Inst., 333 U.S. 683, 705 , 68 S.Ct. 793, 805 , 92 L.Ed. 1010 (1948)), vacated per settlement, 403 F.Sup…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Football League v. National Football League
See Buckhead Theatre Co. v. Atlanta Enters., Inc., 327 F.2d 365, 368-69 (5th Cir.) (evidence of prior antitrust judgment irrelevant unless plaintiff introduced evidence that practices complained of in prior case “had an injurious effect upon the plaintiff”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964); Bray v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 392 F.Supp. 851, 866 (prior antitrust judgment admitted where underlying conduct was same as that alleged in main case) (citing FTC v. Cement Inst., 333 U.S. 683, 705 , 68 S.Ct. 793, 805 , 92 L.Ed. 1010 (1948)), vacated per settlement, 403 F…
cited
Cited "see"
Anne D. Nickola v. Kenneth Peterson, D/B/A Kaydee Products Company
See Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Sup. Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 .” VI.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry Ernest Meeker
United States v. Alsop, 479 F.2d 65, 66-67 (9th Cir. 1973) (construing “intimidation” in the bank robbery statute, 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a); accord, United States v. Jacquillon, 469 F.2d 380, 385 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 938 , 93 S.Ct. 1400 , 35 L.Ed.2d 604 (1973). 3 Mims v. United States, 332 F.2d 944 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 *16 S.Ct. 158, 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964), is not contrary to our construction of intimidation.
discussed
Cited "see"
William Minor Deyerle and Orthopedic Equipment Company, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Wright Manufacturing Company and Frank O. Wright
(2×)
See Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Sup. Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 .' 440 F.2d at 81 . 49 Without reviewing in detail the District Court's findings of fact on the issue of obviousness, we point out that the District Judge found nothing in the prior art which immobilized a fracture against shearing and torsion forces while allowing for absorption at the fracture site in order to encourage early weight bearing and ambulation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.
See Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Sup. Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir.), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 .” 3 Appellant contends that the clearly erroneous standard is inapplicable to the extent that findings rest on documentary evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Amsterdam Wrecking & Salvage Co., Inc. v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America
See Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 159 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 92 (1964); cf. NLRB v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 , 93 S.Ct. 74 , 34 L.Ed.2d 201 (1972); NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 85 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). 1 Marvin Martens, Ralph Martens (Marvin's son), and David Furman.
discussed
Cited "see"
Amsterdam Wrecking & Salvage Co. v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 159 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 92 (1964); cf. NLRB v. International Van Lines, 409 U.S. 48 , 93 S.Ct. 74 , 34 L.Ed.2d 201 (1972); NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U.S. 575 , 85 S.Ct. 1918 , 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). .
cited
Cited "see"
Kolene Corporation, and Deutsche Gold-Und-Silber Scheideanstalt Vormals Roessler v. Motor City Metal Treating, Inc.
See Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Sup. Co., 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 .
cited
Cited "see"
Filterite Corp. v. Tate Engineering, Inc.
See Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Supply Co., 332 F.2d 406, 414 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waldon, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Alexander Manufacturing Company and Amco International, Defendants-Appellees-Cross
See Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing & Supply Company, 6 Cir. 1964, 332 F.2d 406 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 which applied this principle in a patent ease and held there was no error in denying a jury trial on the question of obviousness even though it involves several factual inquiries. 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
James William Bailey v. United States of America, Sidney Rolls, AKA Sidney Ross v. United States of America, Gary Lee Wilson v. United States or America, Leonard Leroy Cann v. United States of America, Robert Freeman, Jr. v. United States
See, Mims v. United States, 10 Cir., 332 F.2d 944 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 ; Cathcart v. United States, 10 Cir., 244 F.2d 74 , cert. denied, 354 U.S. 924 , 77 S.Ct. 1387 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1439 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bailey v. United States
See, Mims v. United States, 10 Cir., 332 F.2d 944 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 ; Cathcart v. United States, 10 Cir., 244 F.2d 74 , cert. denied, 354 U.S. 924 , 77 S.Ct. 1387 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1439 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
See, e.g., Buckhead Theatre Co. v. Atlanta Enterprises, 327 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alex Harding, A/K/A Mark Harding
See also Mims v. United States, 332 F.2d 944 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Norton Company, Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Hadco Corporation,defendants-Appellees
See, e. g., Monroe Auto Equipment Co. v. Heckethorn Mfg. & Supply Co., 332 F.2d 406, 411 (6th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 , on the one hand and Maytag Co. v. Murray Corp., 318 F.2d 79, 81 (6th Cir. 1963), on the other.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ajem Laboratories, Inc., and Centri-Spray Corporation v. C. M. Ladd Co., Inc., and Charles M. Ladd
See also Monroe Auto Equipment Company v. Heckethorn Manufacturing and Supply Company, 332 F.2d 406 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 160 , 13 L.Ed.2d 93 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Callman Gottesman, Maria Mattiello, and Paul J. Peyser v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company,defendants-Appellees
See, e. g., Buckhead Theatre Co. v. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc., 327 F.2d 365, 368 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964); International Shoe Machine Corp. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 315 F.2d 449, 459 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820 , 84 S.Ct. 56 , 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dart Drug Corporation v. Parke, Davis & Company
(2×)
See also Park Neponset Corp. v. Smith, 258 F.2d 452 (1st Cir. 1958), and Buckhead Theatre Co. v. Atlanta Enterprises, Inc., 327 F.2d 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 888 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 92 (1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. (Miami Cabinet Division)
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 366.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 26, 1964.
379 U.S. 888
John B. Hol-lister for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ord-man, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent National Labor Relations Board.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.