green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard T. Ford
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Comment, 31 U.Chi.L.Rev. 535, 540-41 (1964) 20 See, e.g., Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 323 F.2d 808, 813 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964) (Wright, J., concurring); Taylor v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 183 , 238 F.2d 259, 262 (1956); United States v. Provoo, 17 F.R.D. 183, 203 (D.Md.), aff'd mem., 350 U.S. 857 , 76 S.Ct. 101 , 100 L.Ed. 761 (1955); Comment, 31 U.Chi.L.Rev. 535, 537 n.14 (1964); Schindler, 35 U.Cin.L.Rev. 179, 182 (1966); Note, 18 Rutgers L.Rev. 828, 834 (1964); Note, 1966 Wash.U.L.Q. 417, 423-24; Note, 77 Yale…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Seymour Pollack, United States of America v. Paul M. Sachs, United States of America v. William Cudd
See Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 342, 323 F.2d 808, 812 (1963), cert. denied 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964) (Wright, J., concurring) (pre Marion case discussing deliberate delay in terms of Sixth Amendment).
cited
Cited "see"
Henson v. United States
See Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 323 F.2d 808 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964), and cases collected at 808—809. 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Saiz
See Schneider, The Right to a Speedy Trial, 20 Stan.L.Rev. 476, 488-503 (1968); Note, Justice Overdue— Speedy Trial for the Potential Defendant, 5 Stan.L.Rev. 95 (1952); See Judge Skelly Wright’s footnote in Mann v. United States, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 27 , 304 F.2d 394 , 396 n. 4, cert. denied 371 U.S. 896 , 83 S.Ct. 194 , 9 L.Ed.2d 127 (1962); See his concurring opinion in Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 323 F.2d 808 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Murphy and Albert Mendes
See United States v. Johnson, 331 F.2d 281 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 196 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Jewell James Williams v. United States
See Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S. App.D.C. 338, 323 F.2d 808 (1963), cert. den. 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 178 (1964); Forsberg v. United States, 351 F.2d 242 (9th Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winnie D. Earl v. United States
(2×)
See Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 342, 323 F.2d 808, 812 (1963) (concurring opinion), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964); Wilson v. United States, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 319 , 321, 335 F.2d 982, 984 (1964) (opinion of Chief Judge Bazelon on petition for rehearing en banc) 2 In several recent cases involving delays of much less than fourteen months, this court has remanded for consideration of the circumstances surrounding the delay.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Watts v. Supreme Court
Thomas v. Pate, 351 F. 2d 910, 912 , cert. den. 383 U. S. 962 ; Germany v. Hudspeth, 209 F. 2d 15, 19 , cert, den. 347 U. S. 946 ; see, also, Nickens v. United States, 323 F. 2d 808 , cert. den. 379 U. S. 905 ; but, see, Williams v. United States, 250 F. 2d 19 .) Protection of one of an accused’s constitutional rights will not necessarily cause the violation of another.\ Since “ our concern with justice * * * mandates that constitutional rights be .safeguarded and that procedures evolve which protect the interests of both society and defendants alike ”, where rights conflict the two inte…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Pickens Davis, Jr.
See also Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 323 F.2d 808 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nickens
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 220.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1964.
379 U.S. 905
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.