green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In Re the Estate of Hernandez
See Lowman v. Falsetti, 335 F.2d 632, 638 (5th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 966 , 85 S.Ct. 659 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
in the Matter of the Estate of Maria Enriqueta Hernandez
See Lowman v. Falsetti, 335 F.2d 632, 638 (5th Cir. 1964), cert. denied , 379 U.S. 966 , 85 S.Ct. 659 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Judith Lynne Madrid, Debtor. Judith Lynne Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp., and Donald Turney
(2×)
See Britt v. Damson, 334 F.2d 896 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 966 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (1965); Glessner v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., 353 F.2d 986 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 970 , 86 S.Ct. 1859 , 16 L.Ed.2d 681 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Commissioner
The partnership made no physical improvements to the property during 1976 and 1977. 7 Although petitioners contend the partnership would have done so but for the rezoning problems, they have not provided a sufficient basis for us to distinguish the rezoning litigation from events common to rezoning activities in general which are clearly capital in nature. 8 Soelling v. Commissioner, 70 T.C. at 1056 ; Galt v. Commissioner, 19 T.C. 892 , 910 (1953) , affd. in part and revd. in part 216 F.2d 41 (7th Cir. 1954) , cert. denied 348 U.S. 951 (1955) ; accord Godfrey v. Commissioner, 335 F.2d 82 , 85 …
cited
Cited "see"
Bakst v. Disler (In re Disler)
McArdle v. Schneider, D.C.Mass.1964, 228 F.Supp. 506 ; see Lowman v. Falsetti, 5 Cir. 1964, 335 F.2d 632, 639 , cert. den. 379 U.S. 966 , 85 S.Ct. 659 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Canty v. Otto
Specifically, 11 U.S.C. § 101 (54)(D) (2006) defines transfer as "each mode, direct or indirect, absolute or conditional, voluntary or involuntary, of disposing of or parting with(i) property; or (ii) an interest in property." In 1999, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia recognized that "it is now well settled that a transfer of property pursuant to a collusive divorce decree or property settlement intended to hinder, delay or defraud creditors (or pursuant to a divorce decree or property settlement for inadequate consideration, leaving the debtor insolvent) constitutes a `tra…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abramson v. Printer's Bindery, Inc.
See also Britt v. Damson, 334 F.2d 896 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 85 S.Ct. 661 , 379 U.S. 966 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 (adequate and fair consideration); Gonterman v. Nicholas, 270 F.2d 509 (5th Cir. 1959) (fair consideration); Mayo v. Pioneer Bank & Trust Co., 270 F.2d 823 , 274 *330 F.2d 320 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 962 , 80 S.Ct. 878 , 4 L.Ed.2d 877 (lists six elements necessary to support voidance of transfer by trustee — if any lacking there is no preference); Hummell v. Cernocky, 161 F.2d 685 (7th Cir. 1947); Harper v. Lloyd’s Factors, 214 F.2d 662 (2d Cir.1954) (sale of a…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aeronautical Radio, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 609.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 1965.
Donald C. Beelar, John S. Yodice and John E. Stephen for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Henry Getter and Daniel B. Ohlbaum for the United States et al.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.