Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
T.A.M., Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
(2×)
E.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), ce rt. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1964) (refusing to treat franchise system and trademark as “tying” products); Reed v. Shell Oil Co., 524 F.2d 1054 (10th Cir.1975) (Shell trademark “cannot be considered as a ‘product’ ”).
examined
Cited "but see"
State v. Lawn King, Inc.
(4×)
N.J. · 1980 · signal: but see · confidence high
Id. at 6, 78 S.Ct. at 518, 2 L.Ed.2d at 550; but see Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 518 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "but see"
David Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. And Quincy Adams Donuts, Inc. C/o C.T. Corporation, in No. 75--1625. John Rader, an Individual v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, in No. 75--1626
(2×)
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) (refusing to treat a franchise system as involving a single unified product).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.
(2×)
3rd Cir. · 1976 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see, Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) (refusing to treat a franchise system as involving a single unified product).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Merrill v. State
Alaska · 1969 · confidence medium
Stirone v. United States, 341 F.2d 253 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 902 , 85 S. Ot. 1446, 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1985), held claims of errors in the selection of the jury, such as the absence of the trial judge during peremptory challenges and the fact that voir dire was conducted by the deputy clerk and was not recorded, did not rise to constitutional proportions and did not require a vacating of the sentence where the defendant had had the opportunity to raise the issues earlier but had failed to do so. .
examined
Cited "see"
Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.
(4×)
N.J. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 206 F.Supp. 636, 640 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), app. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) in which the court explained that * * * the cornerstone of a franchise system must be the trademark or trade name of a product.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kellam Energy, Inc. v. Duncan
(2×)
D. Del. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 520 (2d Cir.1964), *881 ce rt. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neptune T.V. & Appliance Service, Inc. v. Litton Microwave Cooking Products Division, Litton Systems, Inc.
(2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 206 F.Supp. 636, 640 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), app. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965), in which the court explained that * * * the cornerstone of a franchise system must be the trademark or trade name of a product.
discussed
Cited "see"
Neptune TV & App. v. LITTON MICROWAVE, ETC.
(2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 206 F. Supp. 636, 640 (S.D.N.Y. 1962), aff'd 332 F. 2d 505 (2d Cir.1964), app. dism. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed. 2d 284 (1965), in which the court explained that * * * the cornerstone of a franchise system must be the trademark or trade name of a product.
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Northern and Shirley Northern v. McGraw Company, Betty Soper and Jeffson Industries, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees
(2×)
8th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
Warriner Hermetics, Inc. v. Copeland Refrigeration Corp., 463 F.2d 1002, 1012-1016 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1086 , 93 S.Ct. 688 , 34 L.Ed.2d 673 (1972); Siegel v. Chicken Delight, Inc., 448 F.2d 43, 47-49 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 955 , 92 S.Ct. 1172 , 31 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972); see Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Finlay & Associates, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp.
(2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 206 F. Supp. 636 (S.D.N.Y. 1962), aff'd 332 F. 2d 505 (2 Cir.1964), cert. granted, but later dismissed at 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed. 2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matarazzo v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.
(2×)
E.D.N.Y · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir.), cert. granted, 379 U.S. 885 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964), cert, dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); 84 Harv.L.Rev. 1717, 1722 & n. 24 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. SS Kresge Company
(2×)
W.D. Pa. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 518 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.
(2×)
E.D. Mich. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965) ; McElhenney Co. v. Western Auto Supply Co., 269 F.2d 332 (4th Cir. 1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
NW Controls, Inc. v. Outboard Marine Corporation
(2×)
D. Del. · 1971 · signal: see · confidence high
See Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 514 (C.A.2, 1964), cert. dis. 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965). 6.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.
(2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roosevelt Rollerson v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ferina v. United States, 340 F.2d 837 (8th Cir.), cert denied, 381 U.S. 902 , 85 S.Ct. 1446 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); Barker v. Ohio, 328 F.2d 582 (6th Cir. 1964) ; Velazquez v. Sanford, 150 F.2d 491 (5th Cir. 1945). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
Bob Fred Ashe v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden
8th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See the comments of Judge Mehaffy, in speaking for this court, in Ferina v. United States, 340 F.2d 837, 839 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 381 U.S. 902 , 85 S.Ct. 1446 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ali Shamaeizadeh v. Joel Cunigan
6th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Perchitti, 955 F.2d 674, 677 (11th Cir.1992) (explaining that cooperation between federal and state authorities in the investigation of a defendant does not necessarily establish privity between the federal and state governments); see also Ferina v. United States, 340 F.2d 837, 840 (8th Cir.) (merely using the fruits of federal investigations in state proceedings "does not infect the separate sovereignty of that prosecution, nor bind the federal government in any manner to the issues so resolved by the state judgment”), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 902 , 85 S.Ct. 1446 , 14 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lois E. Hilton Ford
(2×)
5th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hopt v. Utah, 110 U.S. 574, 577-79 , 4 S.Ct. 202, 203-05 , 28 L.Ed. 262 (1884). . 341 F.2d 253 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 902 , 85 S.Ct. 1446 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
KFC Corp. v. Marion-Kay Co., Inc.
(2×)
S.D. Ind. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Susser v. Carvel Corporation, 332 F.2d 505, 517 (2d Cir.), cert. granted 379 U.S. 885 , 85 S.Ct. 158 , 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964) and cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Data General Corp. Antitrust Litigation
(2×)
N.D. Cal. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 520 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. dismissed, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); Baker v. Simmons Co., 307 F.2d 458 (1st Cir. 1962); United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545 (E.D.Pa.1960), aff’d per curiam, 365 U.S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abraham Grunin v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., Shapiro, Posell & Pilling and Mitchell S. Shapiro v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., Mark J. Klein v. International House of Pancakes, a Division of International Industries, Inc., David Berger, P. A., Cross-Appellant v. Mark J. Klein, Cross-Appellee
(2×)
8th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965). 28 In addition, appellees here contend that because the lease of equipment was not made a prerequisite to acquiring a franchise, the absence of coercion makes the Chicken Delight rationale inapposite.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grunin v. International House of Pancakes
(2×)
8th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Susser v. Carvel Corp., 332 F.2d 505, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 125 , 85 S.Ct. 1364 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William R. McIntosh v. United States of America, Joe Dale Wilson v. United States
8th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ferina v. United States, 340 F.2d 837 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 902 , 85 S.Ct. 1446 , 14 L.Ed.2d 284 (1965); Kistner v. United States, 332 F.2d 978 (8th Cir. 1964); 21 Am.Jur. 2d Criminal Law § 394.