green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Burns
(2×)
See *1362 Natural Resources, Inc. v. Wineberg, 349 F.2d 685, 691 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 617 , 15 L.Ed.2d 525 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Educational Development Corporation v. The Economy Company
See Bardahl Oil Company v. Atomic Oil Company of Oklahoma, 10 Cir., 351 F.2d 148 , 150, cert. denied 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 619 , 15 L.Ed.2d 526 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Weisman
(2×)
Probasco, 839 F.2d at 1355 ; see also Natural Resources, Inc., v. Wineberg, 349 F.2d 685, 690 (9th Cir.1965) (under California law whether possession is such to require inquiry is question of ultimate fact), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 617 , 15 L.Ed.2d 525 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robertson v. Peters (In re Weisman)
(2×)
Probasco, 839 F.2d at 1355 ; see also Natural Resources, Inc., v. Wineberg, 349 F.2d 685, 690 (9th Cir.1965) (under California law whether possession is such to require inquiry is question of ultimate fact), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 617 , 15 L.Ed.2d 525 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guam Hakubotan, Inc. v. Furusawa Investment Corporation, Julale Investment Corporation, and Yasuda Shoji Kk
(2×)
See Beeler, 147 P.2d at 587 (appellate court will not disturb trial court’s finding that deed is mortgage “where there is substantial evidence warranting a clear and satisfactory conviction to that effect”); see also Natural Resources, Inc. v. Wineberg, 349 F.2d 685, 688 (9th Cir.1965) (whether deed is mortgage is factual question reviewed for clear error) (applying California law), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 617 , 15 L.Ed.2d 525 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 523, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,222 in Re William R. Probasco Joan Probasco Eddie McKinney Thelma Jo McKinney Bill J. Eads Patsy M. Eads, Debtors. William R. Probasco Joan Probasco Mid Valley Time Loan Robert C. Arnold, as Disbursing Agent Under the Plan of Reorganization v. Bill J. Eads Patsy M. Eads
(2×)
See also Natural Resources, Inc. v. Wineberg, 349 F.2d 685, 689-90 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 617 , 15 L.Ed.2d 525 (1966); High Fidelity Enter., Inc. v. Hull, 210 Cal.App.2d 279, 281 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 654, 655 (1962); Manig v. Bachman, 127 Cal.App.2d 216, 221 , 273 P.2d 596, 599-600 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Probasco v. Eads (In re Probasco)
(2×)
See also Natural Resources, Inc. v. Wineberg, 349 F.2d 685, 689-90 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 617 , 15 L.Ed.2d 525 (1966); High Fidelity Enter., Inc. v. Hull, 210 Cal.App.2d 279, 281 , 26 Cal.Rptr. 654, 655 (1962); Manig v. Bachman, 127 Cal.App.2d 216, 221 , 273 P.2d 596, 599-600 (1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alfred B. Diggs
(2×)
Compare Corngold v. United States, 367 F.2d 1, 7 (1966) (en banc), overruling Marshall v. United States, 352 F.2d 1013 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1010 , 86 S.Ct. 618 , 15 L.Ed.2d 526 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Natural Resources, Inc.
v.
Wineberg
v.
Wineberg
No. 778.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1966.
James C. Dezendorf for petitioners.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.