green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 1993–2016 · 2 courts ·
…the uniform act was intended as a matter of comity between states to enable states to obtain material witnesses for criminal prosecutions.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lewis v. State
the uniform act was intended as a matter of comity between states to enable states to obtain material witnesses for criminal prosecutions.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Breeden
the uniform act was intended as a matter of comity between states to enable states to obtain material witnesses for criminal prosecutions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tracy v. Superior Court
(2×)
The operation of the Uniform Act depends upon the principles of comity, and it has no efficacy except through the adoption of the same act by another state." 83 Ariz. 248, 251 , 320 P.2d 446, 448 (1958) (quoting State v. Blount, 200 Or. 35 , 264 P.2d 419, 426 (1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 962 , 74 S.Ct. 711 , 98 L.Ed. 1105 (1954)), cert. denied, 357 U.S. 922 , 78 S.Ct. 1364 (1958); accord State v. Lesco, 194 Kan. 555 , 400 P.2d 695, 699 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1015 , 86 S.Ct. 628 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966); In re Saperstein, 30 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corporation
See Giraud v. United States, 348 F.2d 820, 822 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1015 , 86 S.Ct. 627 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966); see also United States v. Brown, 425 F.2d 1172, 1174 (9th Cir.1970)(per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Giraud v. United States, 348 F.2d 820, 822 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1015 , 86 S.Ct. 627 , 15 L.Ed.2d 529 (1966); see also United States v. Brown, 425 F.2d 1172, 1174 (9th Cir.1970)(per curiam).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Steelman
See State v. Schantz, 98 Ariz. 200 , 403 P.2d 521 (1965), cert. den. 382 U.S. 1015 , 86 S.Ct. 628 , 15 L.Ed.2d 530 (1966); State v. Richardson, 110 Ariz. 48 , 514 P.2d 1236 (1973), cert. den. 415 U.S. 929 , 94 S.Ct. 1439 , 39 L.Ed.2d 487 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gardner
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1966.
Charles L. Decker for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Gla-zer for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1) · Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.