green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
Simko v. Marine Maintenance Co.
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673, 674-75 (3d Cir.), Cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Simko v. C & C Marine Maintenance Co.
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673, 674-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. DiMuro
See United States v. Hall, 342 F.2d 849, 853 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965). .
discussed
Cited "see"
ca1 1976
See United States v. Hall, 342 F.2d 849, 853 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965). 14 Although only the composite tape was played for the jury, all the recorded conversations were received in evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Norman Burris v. Golbal Bulk Carriers, Inc. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-Party-Defendant
(2×)
See Gilchrist, supra, 405 F.2d at 769 . 2 For this proposition, the Gilchrist court relied on dicta in Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Special February 1971 Grand Jury, Howard Jachimowski v. James B. Conlisk, Jr., Superintendent of Police
See, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, supra (Brennan, J., dissenting), United States v. Berata, 343 F.2d 469 , 2d Cir. 1965, cert, den, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Dreyer v. Jalet
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 339 F.2d 673 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Erika Olund v. Russell L. Swarthout
See Wiper v. Great Lakes Engineering Works, 340 F.2d 727, 731 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Hobart v. Sohio Petroleum Co.
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 3d Cir. 1964, 339 F.2d 673 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
ca3 1971
See Ellerman Lines, Ltd. v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc., 3d Cir. 1964, 339 F.2d 673 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Morgan
Furthermore, nothing in the record suggests that either the municipal court or county court judge took judicial noticeor, indeed, any other kind of noticeof any facts indicating that the area in question was residential in character. [ Id. at 312-13, 394 A. 2d 355 .] Since the State failed to "offer [ ] any evidence of the applicable speed limit," the Court affirmed our earlier reversal of the defendant's conviction. [5] Id. at 313, 394 A. 2d 355 ; see also, State v. Ring, 85 N.J.Super. 341, 342 , 204 A. 2d 716 (App. Div.1964) (reversing defendant's speeding conviction where no proof of la…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Springer v. United States
See also, United States v. Hall, 342 F.2d 849, 852-53 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Enriquito Alsondo
See also United States v. Hall, 342 F.2d 849 , 852 n. 4 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965), where the court strongly implied that scienter is a necessary element under 18 U.S.C. § 372 , making it unlawful to “conspire ... to injure [any officer of the United States] in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office.” .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Maryland, Dept. of N. Res. v. Amerada Hess Corp.
See also Wiper v. Great Lakes Engineering Works, 340 F.2d 727, 730 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 812 , 86 S.Ct. 28 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 : “[I]t is well-settled that absent a maritime status between the parties the traditional test of locality of the tort governs the question of whether maritime or state law is applicable. * * * ” 11 .
Atlantic & Gulp Stevedores, Inc.
v.
Ellerman Lines, Ltd.
v.
Ellerman Lines, Ltd.
No. 78.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Francis E. Marshall for petitioner., Mark D. Alspach for respondent.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.