green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Office of the Chairperson, District of Columbia Board of Parole
But, “[i]f predicated on facts that existed prior to the imposition of sentence, a motion under section 2255 may encompass ail the grounds that might be included in a habeas corpus petition.” Id.; see Stirone v. Markley, 345 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.) (grounds for motion to vacate sentence under § 2255 encompass all grounds that might be set up in an application for habeas corpus predicated on facts that existed at or prior to time of imposition of sentence), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 829 , 86 S.Ct. 67 , 15 L.Ed.2d 73 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Perkins v. Henderson
But, “[i]f predicated on facts that existed prior to the imposition of sentence, a motion under section 2255 may encompass all the grounds that might be included in a habeas corpus petition.” Id.; see Stirone v. Markley, 345 F.2d 473 (7th Cir.) (grounds for motion to vacate sentence under § 2255 encompass all grounds that might be set up in an application for habeas corpus predicated on facts that existed at or prior to time of imposition of sentence), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 829 , 86 S.Ct. 67 , 15 L.Ed.2d 73 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Ford
See United States v. DiFronzo, 345 F.2d 383 , 385 & n.1 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 829 (1965); United States v. Banks, 485 F.2d 545 , *580 549 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 987 (1974); State v. Williams, 39 Ohio St. 2d 20, 20-21, 26 (1974). 4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bartz v. State of Oregon
See, e.g., Stirone v. Markley, 345 F2d 473, 475, cert den 382 US 829 (7th Cir 1965) ( 28 USC § 2255 is not an unconstitutional suspension of the writ of habeas corpus where statutory procedures relating to expeditious consideration of motions, entertainment of successive motions, and production of the prisoner are adequate substitutes for equivalent procedures under the writ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Flowers
(2×)
Compare United States v. DiFronzo, 345 F. 2d 383, 385 (7th Cir.), cert. den. 382 U. S. 829 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Cleve Brown
See also Burge v. United States, 342 F.2d 408 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 829 , 86 S.Ct. 63 , 15 L.Ed.2d 72 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burge
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 262.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Clifford J. Groh and George Kauf-mann for petitioner., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.