green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
“a defendant has no constitutional right to elect which of two applicable statutes shall be the basis of his indictment and prosecution.”
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Carmona v. Ward
a defendant has no constitutional right to elect which of two applicable statutes shall be the basis of his indictment and prosecution.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. James R. Jones
That choice is to be made by the United States Attorney." Id. at 967.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert E. Mills. United States of America v. Kenneth B. Wonson. United States of America v. Vernon L. Holland
See Hutcherson v. United States, 345 F.2d 964, 967 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 894 , 86 S.Ct. 188 , 15 L.Ed.2d 151 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harold Farris, United States of America v. Jody Satiacum, United States of America v. Allen Dudley Powell, United States of America v. Louis J. Baker, United States of America v. Ray Turnipseed, Bertha Turnipseed, and MacKenzie Turnipseed, Defendants- United States of America v. David Painter, United States of America v. Melvyn Lockwood
See Hutcherson v. United States, 345 F.2d 964, 967 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 894 , 86 S.Ct. 188 , 15 L.Ed.2d 151 (1965). 40 Nor are we convinced that § 1955's harsher penalty proves that Congress meant only § 1175 to apply to Indians.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Farris
See Hutcherson v. United States, 345 F.2d 964, 967 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 894 , 86 S.Ct. 188 , 15 L.Ed.2d 151 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Milton Dean Batchelder
(2×)
See Hutcherson v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 274 , 278-279, 345 F.2d 964, 968-969 (1965) (Burger, J., concurring), certiorari denied, 382 U.S. 894 , 86 S.Ct. 188 , 15 L.Ed.2d 151 13 Because of the conflict of circuits suggested by the Government, this opinion has been circulated to the active members of this Court and no judge has requested a rehearing En banc with respect to this proposition 14 Defendant's reliance on United States v. Lewin, 467 F.2d 1132 (7th Cir. 1972) and United States v. Dellinger, supra, is misplaced.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome T. Bland
(2×)
See also Hutcherson v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 274 , 345 F.2d 964 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 894 , 86 S.Ct. 188 , 15 L.Ed.2d 151 (1965). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William R. Gaskins v. United States
(2×)
See also Hutcherson v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 274 , 280, 345 F.2d 964, 970 (concurring opinion), cert. denied 382 U.S. 894 , 86 S.Ct. 188 , 15 L.Ed.2d 151 (1965). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson, Governor of Kansas
v.
Harris
v.
Harris
No. 434.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 25, 1965.
Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and Charles N. Henson, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners,, William Y. Chalfant for respondents.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Sup. Ct. Kan. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.